My book does this :
$x=\frac {(z+\bar z)}2$. Then $\frac {\partial x}{\partial \bar z}=\frac 12$.
But this doesn't make sense to me as $\bar z$ is a function of $z$. Would we say that if $y=x+x^2$ then $\frac {\partial y}{\partial x^2}=1$?
My book does this :
$x=\frac {(z+\bar z)}2$. Then $\frac {\partial x}{\partial \bar z}=\frac 12$.
But this doesn't make sense to me as $\bar z$ is a function of $z$. Would we say that if $y=x+x^2$ then $\frac {\partial y}{\partial x^2}=1$?
On
We are talking about Wirtinger derivatives here:$$\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)\text{ and }\frac{\partial f}{\partial\overline z}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right).$$
The operator $\partial \over \partial \overline{z}$ has a very precise definition, unlike $\partial \over \partial x^2$ that you just made up to make a point.
That definition is $\frac 12({\partial \over \partial x}+i{\partial \over \partial y})$ where $\partial \over \partial x$ and $\partial \over \partial y$ work the way you imagine.
Therefore you can see that $\partial \over \partial \overline{z}$ is linear, and satisfies ${\partial \over \partial \overline{z}}(z)=0$ and ${\partial \over \partial \overline{z}}(\overline{z})=1$.