Phase transition threshold for acyclic directed graph

173 Views Asked by At

Let $G$ be an acyclic directed graph with $MN$ vertices arranged into $M$ generations of $N$ vertices each. We stipulate that edges may only go from generation $j$ to generation $j+1$, so there are $(M-1)N^2$ permissible edges. Each permissible edge is chosen independently with probability $p$, and the resulting subset of permissible edges is used to construct $G$.

The quantity of interest is the probability $P(p)$ that a randomly-chosen vertex $x$ in the first generation of $G$ is connected by a directed path to a random-chosen vertex $y$ in the $M$th generation of $G$. As $N$ becomes large for fixed $M$, one expects a phase transition in $P$ from near $0$ to near $1$ as $p$ crosses some threshold $p_0$.

Question: What is this threshold $p_0$ in terms of $M$ and $N$?

For example, when $M=3$ (first interesting case), it seems that the threshold is $p_0=N^{-\frac{1}{2}}$, and I would guess that $p_0=N^{-\frac{M-2}{M-1}}$ in general.

Is this correct, and how does one prove it? Or where can I find this problem analyzed? I have found many somewhat-relevant sources on percolation, but they mostly involve lattices or Erdös-Rényi graphs.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On

I have no final answer but this is my progress:

Here is an explicit formula for $P(p)$: $$P(p) = 1 - (1-p^{M-1})^{N^{M-2}}$$

Here $1 - p^{M-1}$ is the probability that a complete path from $v_1$ to $v_M$ is not completely connected and $N^{M-2}$ is the number of possible paths from $v_1$ to $v_M$. (Where $v_i$ is some node in generation $i$).

Inserting $M=3$ and $p_0 = N^{\frac{-1}{2}}$ gives you: $$P(p_0) = 1 - \left(\frac{N-1}{N}\right)^N.$$

Your general formula for $p_0$ will give you: $$P(p_0) = 1 - \left( \frac{K-1}{K} \right)^K$$ where $K := N^{M-2}$

Increasing $p_0$ above that threshold will decrease the subtractor, thus increasing $P(p_0)$, which follows the intuition. Decreasing $p_0$ will decrease the whole expression, thus making $P$ monotonically increasing in $p_0$.

I can't really see a clear transition here. Still curious if you can use that.