A manifold (orientable or unorientable) may or may not be pin$^+$. If we know the pin$^+$ property of $M$ and $N$, can we determine the pin$^+$ property of $M\# N$? Similarly, if we know the pin$^-$ property of $M$ and $N$, can we determine the pin$^-$ property of $M\# N$?
2026-03-26 06:19:04.1774505944
pin$^{\pm}$ structure under connected sum
269 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in SPIN-GEOMETRY
- Spin Bundle and Connection on $R^3$?
- Meaning of notation in John Roe's Elliptic Operators book
- Spinor bundle of a spin Manifold is a Clifford bundle
- Handle attachment and spin$^c$ structures
- Inclusion between spin groups?
- Understanding of Spin(n) and SO(n)
- Spinor chiral transformation by $\psi \to \gamma^5 \psi$
- On Proposition 2.6 Gualtieri Thesis Generalized complex geometry
- "Square root" of a decomposition of a homogeneous polynomial to harmonic and $x^2 q$.
- Reference request for the irreps of the Spin group
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
pin$^+$: A manifold $M$ admits a pin$^+$ structure if and only if $w_2(M) = 0$.
If $M$ is a zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, or a non-closed two-dimensional manifold, then $M$ admits pin$^+$ structures as $w_2(M) \in H^2(M; \mathbb{Z}_2) = 0$.
On a closed two-dimensional manifold, the second Stiefel-Whitney class is zero if and only if the second Stiefel-Whitney number is zero. As the top Stiefel-Whitney number of a closed manifold is the mod $2$ reduction of its Euler characteristic, we see that a closed surface admits pin$^+$ structures if and only if it has even Euler characteristic. As $\chi(M\# N) = \chi(M) + \chi(N) - 2$ for closed surfaces $M$ and $N$, we see that if $M$ and $N$ admit pin$^+$ structures, then so does $M\# N$. Note that the converse doesn't hold. For example, $M = N = \mathbb{RP}^2$ doesn't admit pin$^+$ structures as $\chi(\mathbb{RP}^2) = 1$, but $K = \mathbb{RP}^2\#\mathbb{RP}^2$ does admit pin$^+$ structures as $\chi(K) = 0$.
If $\dim M = \dim N > 2$, then $H^2(M\# N; \mathbb{Z}_2) \cong H^2(M; \mathbb{Z}_2) \oplus H^2(N; \mathbb{Z}_2)$ and under this isomorphism, $w_2(M\# N)$ is identified with $w_2(M) + w_2(N)$. Therefore, $M\# N$ admits a pin$^+$ structure if and only if $M$ and $N$ admit pin$^+$ structures.
Therefore, we have the answer to your first question:
Furthermore, if $\dim M = \dim N \neq 2$, the converse is also true.
pin$^-$: A manifold $M$ admits a pin$^-$ structure if and only if $w_1(M)^2 + w_2(M) = 0$.
If $M$ is a zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, or a non-closed two-dimensional manifold, then $M$ admits pin$^-$ structures as $w_1(M)^2 + w_2(M) \in H^2(M; \mathbb{Z}_2) = 0$.
Furthermore, every closed manifold $M$ of dimension $n = 2$ or $3$ admits pin$^-$ structures. To see this, first recall that $w_1^2(M) + w_2(M)$ is the second Wu class $\nu_2(M)$ and that $\operatorname{Sq}^2 : H^{n-2}(M; \mathbb{Z}_2) \to H^n(M; \mathbb{Z}_2)$ is given by $\operatorname{Sq}^2(x) = \nu_2(M)\cup x$. But for any $x \in H^{n-2}(M; \mathbb{Z}_2)$, $\operatorname{Sq}^2(x) = 0$ as $\operatorname{deg} x = n - 2 \leq 1 < 2$, so by Poincaré duality, $\nu_2(M) = 0$ and hence $M$ admits pin$^-$ structures.
If $\dim M = \dim N > 2$, then $H^i(M\# N; \mathbb{Z}_2) \cong H^i(M; \mathbb{Z}_2) \oplus H^i(N; \mathbb{Z}_2)$ for $i = 1, 2$ and under these isomorphisms, $w_i(M\# N)$ is identified with $w_i(M) + w_i(N)$. Furthermore, the ring structure of $H^*(M\# N)$ is such that if $x \in H^k(M)$ and $y \in H^l(N)$, then their product (as classes in $H^*(M\# N)$) is zero, so $w_1(M\# N)^2 = (w_1(M) + w_1(N))^2 = w_1(M)^2 + w_1(N)^2$. Therefore $w_1(M\# N)^2 + w_2(M\# N) = (w_1(M)^2 + w_2(M)) + (w_1(N)^2 + w_2(N))$, and hence $M\# N$ admits pin$^-$ structures if and only if $M$ and $N$ admit pin$^-$ structures.
Therefore, we have the answer to your second question:
Furthermore, the converse is also true.