How I can prove the impossibility of joining three circles to three squares with non-intersecting lines (not strictly straight). Shapes of squares and circles are only representative. Each circle should be piped to each square.
2026-04-13 02:43:01.1776048181
Piping three circles to three squares
860 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in PUZZLE
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Number of divisors 888,888.
- Who has built the house of Mason?
- Is there any tri-angle ?
- In what position , the dogs will reside?
- Number of ways to go from A to I
- Who is the truth teller (logic puzzle)
- How many solutions are there if you draw 14 Crosses in a 6x6 Grid?
- Symmetric latin square diagonal elements
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is an old fact, related more to graph-theory than to game-theory. This is a subpart of the general Kuratowski's Theorem, which says that a graph is nonplanar (meaning it can't be drawn with non-intersecting lines) if and only if it has at least one of two types of special subgraph.
On the left is our graph, which many call $K_{3,3}$, because it has two pairs of $3$ vertices, and each vertex in one pair is connected to all the vertices in the other pair, but not at all to the vertices in its own pair. The other is often called $K_5$, because it's $5$ vertices that are all connected to each other.
So you could appeal to (or look up a proof of) Kuratowski's Theorem.
A much simpler proof uses just the Euler Characteristic, which says $$ v - e + f = 2$$ for planar graphs (that is, graphs that can be drawn without intersecting lines), where $v$ is the number of vertices, $e$ the number of edges, and $f$ is the number of faces, including the external face. This is easily proved from first principles from induction and easily looked up, so I don't prove it here.
In $K_{3,3}$, there are $6$ vertices and $9$ edges. So if it were planar, a planar representation would have $5$ faces. A face is a region bounded by edges with no edges in the middle. Notice that here, any face must have an even number of edges. If an edge starts from a TOP vertex, then it goes to a BOTTOM vertex, to a different TOP vertex. To reconnect to the original, it must first go to the BOTTOM, and then back to the TOP. This is caused by the fact that the TOP vertices only connect to the BOTTOM, and vice versa. In particular, no TOP vertex is connected directly to another TOP vertex. So each face is bounded by at least $4$ edges.
Further, each edge bounds exactly $2$ faces. Since there are $5$ faces with at least $4$ edges, but each edge contributes twice to the faces, there must be at least $5\cdot 4 / 2 = 10$ edges overall for the graph to be planar. But there are only $9$ edges! So it is not planar.