I am stuck with my course work as an undergraduate. It says to write the following statement in the form of predicate logic. The statement is "e. Everyone knows some hard-working people." The one I wrote is "$∀x \space ∃y(People(x) ∧ People(y) ∧ (Hardworking(y) ∧Knows(x, y)))$" Is this correct??
2026-03-25 17:19:21.1774459161
Predicate logic : translate Everyone knows some hard-working people
139 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PREDICATE-LOGIC
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- What does Kx mean in this equation? [in Carnap or Russell and Whitehead's logical notation]
- Exchanging RAA with double negation: is this valid?
- Logical Connectives and Quantifiers
- Is this proof correct? (Proof Theory)
- Is there only a finite number of non-equivalent formulas in the predicate logic?
- Are Proofs of Dependent Pair Types Equivalent to Finding an Inverse Function?
- How to build a list of all the wfs (well-formed sentences)?
- Translations into logical notation
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
Related Questions in LOGIC-TRANSLATION
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Translating an English sentence into predicate logic
- Rewriting a statement in logical form
- Translating a statement into predicate logic
- Propositional Logic Formula
- How to denote "but not" in symbolic logic form?
- Having trouble with a translation in first-order logic
- Translating English to Propositional Logic for NOR
- Using quantifiers to translate sentences
- Compound proposition from Alice in Wonderland
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
With these questions, there could potentially be a lot of correct answers, depending on how you define your variables.
One solution is to denote $P$ as the set of all people. Then we want to write something like "for any person x, there's another person y that is hardworking and that is known by x." Writing this in the mathematical logic notation, we would get $\forall x \in P, \exists y \in P \ni (Hardworking(y) \wedge Knows(x,y))$.