I am a first year maths student with a very strong interest in theoretical physics. I am fluent in Russian and I know that in Russian universities like MPTI Landau and Lifshitz's course in theoretical physics is still used to teach; what prerequisites would I need in order to fully read it, and complete the 'theoretical minimum'? My goal is to first confidently complete the 'Mathematics I' section of the theoretical minimum. Any advice on books, resources, or a list of topics I should confidently understand (and a corresponding order) would be much appreciated. The theoretical minimum I am referring to is Landau and Lifshitz's list, not Susskind's book.
Thank you!
Fair warning: Landau's books are NOT easy at all, and I honestly believe there's no point reading Landau until after (atleast midway through) your second year in mathematics, because otherwise you will be completely unprepared. I've only read volume 1 on Mechanics (this I read very closely) and I've read parts of Volume 2 (Classical Theory of Fields) and Volume 8 (Electrodynamics of Continuous Media), so I can only comment on these.
First of all, the Mathematics I syllabus mentions "integration, ODEs, vector algebra, tensor analysis". This is pretty vague, so let me elaborate on what is needed to understand Volume I of mechanics.
The above is the elaboration of topics (listed in order of prerequisites). The one tweak you can make is that ODEs can be learnt after some single-variable calculus; you don't need multivariable calculus for this. Of course, as you learn this mathematical material you should simultaneously learn the basics of Newtonian classical mechanics using calculus. Without this, I think it is impossible to appreciate the Lagrangian viewpoint.
Before I continue, here's my personal suggestion: don't be in a hurry to start Landau and Lifshitz ASAP. Of course, you should definitely stay curious and skim through the book to see what kinds of things are in there, but don't expect to learn much without the proper background. Also, since you're interested in theoretical physics, I think it is highly advisable that you learn mathematics as a pure math major would learn it. I can't tell you the number of times having a proper math foundation has helped me understand/fill in some of Landau's vague arguments (lol I call them vague for the lack of a better word... maybe Landau finds some things too trivial to even be elaborated on) and also to clarify some issues more rigorously.
Up to this point, there's no need at all for any tensor analysis. Volume 2 is essentially special relativity and electrodynamics. Note that this is NOT AT ALL a good place to start learning the material. You should definitely learn the basics of electromagnetism from a book like Griffiths (where you can also learn the basics of vector calculus). In this book, there is a lot more calculus of variations. At some points you will need things like Fourier Analysis, but this is the sort of thing which you can learn as you go along. One thing I should mention is that in this volume you will need to start learning tensor analysis, and that although Landau has a short 1 chapter introduction on it, I think it is absolutely terrible for actually learning the subject. If you're really serious about understanding some classical field theory and general relativity, you're better off spending some time to learn differential geometry as a mathematician would.
Finally, I should mention that Leonard Susskind has a couple of lecture series, including classical mechanics and another on special relativity and electromagnetism, and I think watching those before/concurrently would be very beneficial.