Proof about outer measure. For an interval $I$, $|I|_e=v(I)$?

55 Views Asked by At

enter image description here

My question is when proving $|I|_e \ge v(I)$, why cannot I conclude from $S={I_k}_{k=1}^\infty$ is a cover of $I$, then $v(I)\le \sigma(S)$, so $v(I)\le inf \sigma(S)=|I|_e$?

Why do we need the $I_k^*$?

Can anyone help? Thanks so much!

The following is the definition of $\sigma (S)$.

enter image description here

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

For example, $ [a,b] \subset \mathbb{R}$ and $\{I_k\}$ is a countable collection of open intervals that covers of $[a,b]$. Let us show $$\sum_{k=1}^\infty v(I_k) \geq b-a.$$

Remark 1: I assumed $I_k$ are open so we do not have to redefine $I_k^*$, thus we skip the $\epsilon$ argument. Remark 2: In order to prove above inequality (which as you said, looks trivial), we have to do the following argument.

Proof: By Heine-Borel theorem, there exists a finite subcover $\{I_{k_n}\}_{n=1}^N$ (lets call them $I_n$ instead of $I_{k_n}$ and we understand that they are a subcollection) and we show that $$\sum_{k=1}^\infty v(I_k) \geq \sum_{n=1}^N v(I_n)\geq b-a.$$

Remark 3: In your book's proof, it says that $\sum_{n=1}^N v(I_n)\geq b-a$ is "clearly" true, but for completeness, I will prove it. (and maybe you will see that $\sum_{k=1}^\infty v(I_k) \geq b-a$ is not so "trivial"...)

The end point $a$ has to be in an open interval in this finite subcollection $\{I_n\}$ let us call it $(a_1, b_1)$ and we have $a\in (a_1, b_1)$, now if $b\in (a_1, b_1)$ then we are done, since $$\sum_{n=1}^N v(I_n)\geq v((a_1,b_1)) = b_1 - a_1 \geq b-a.$$

Else if $b\notin (a_1, b_1)$, we must have $b_1\in [a,b]$. And there is an open interval $(a_2,b_2)$ in $\{I_n\}$ such that $b_1\in (a_2,b_2)$. If $b\in (a_2,b_2)$ then we are done, $$\sum_{n=1}^N v(I_n)\geq v((a_1,b_1)) + v((a_2,b_2)) \geq b-a.$$

Else, we continue until it terminates, and there must exists $N'\leq N$ such that the subcollection $\{(a_i,b_i)\}_{i=1}^{N'}$ of $\{I_n\}_{n=1}^N$ for which $$a_1 < a \quad\quad b_{N'} > b$$ and $$a_{i+1} < b_i\quad \text{ for } 1\leq i\leq N'-1.$$ Then $$\sum_{n=1}^N v(I_n)\geq \sum_{i=1}^{N'} v((a_i,b_i)) = (b_{N'} - a_{N'}) + (b_{N'-1} - a_{N'-1}) + ...+ (b_2 - a_2) + (b_1 - a_1) \\ = b_{N'} - (a_{N'} - b_{N'-1}) - ... - (a_2 - b_1) - a_1 \geq b_{N'} - a_1 \geq b-a.$$