Before anything, sorry if I make any phrasing mistakes. I'm not 100% comfortable with writing in English.
So here's my problem. I don't want the resolution but just a hint on how to proceed for solving it.
For any $n \in \mathbb N$, for any $r_1, r_2, \dots , r_n \in \mathbb R$ such that $\forall i, 1 \le i \le n, r_i > 0$ and $r_1 \times r_2 \times \dots \times r_n = 1$, if $\exists i, 1 \le i \le n$ such that $r_i < 1$, then $\exists j, 1 \le j \le n$ such that $r_j > 1$.
I'm pretty sure it's an induction problem since I need to prove that the hypothesis is true for any $n$.
How I started:
$A(n) = (\exists i, 1 \le i \le n ∣ r_i < 1) \rightarrow (\exists j, 1 \le j \le n ∣ r_j > 1)$
Hypothesis: For any $n \in \mathbb N$, for any $r_1, r_2, \dots , r_n \in \mathbb R$ such that $\forall i, 1 \le i \le n, r_i > 0$ and $r_1 \times r_2 \times \dots \times r_n = 1, A(n)$
Basis step ($ n=1 $):
We have $r_1 = 1$ since the product of the $r_i $ equals $ 1$, therefore since there's only one number ($r_1 = 1$) there's no number $ \ne 1$. Therefore we have $\mathrm {fasle} \rightarrow \mathrm {false}$, so $A(1)$ is true. The basis step is verified.
Let's suppose $A(n)$ is true for $n = k$ (an arbitrary positive integer), then we must show that $A(n)$ is true for $n = k + 1$.
And this is where I'm blocked. I can't find a way to show that if there's a number $< 1$ in the $r_i$ there's necessarily a number $> 1$. And maybe I've made a mistake in my basis step but I can't find where.
Any hint on how to progress or why my reasoning is wrong would be very appreciated.
Thank you very much!
It's actually easier: if $\exists i :r_i<1$ and if we assume that $0<r_j\leq1 \forall j\neq i$, then the product would be $<1\cdot1\cdot\dots1=1$