I am looking at this proof:
Let $(a_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ be a sequence with $a_n \to a$. Choose $\varepsilon =1$, then there is a $N\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n-a|<\varepsilon$ for all $n\geq N$. $$|a_n|=|(a_n-a)+a|\leq |a_n-a|+|a|<1+|a| \quad \text{for all } n\geq N$$
Choose $A:=\max\{1+|a|, |a_1|, ..., |a_{N-1}|\}$. It follows that $|a_n|\leq A$ for all $n\in \mathbb{N}$
I don't understand what $A:=\max\{1+|a|, |a_1|, ..., |a_{N-1}|\}$ means or why one would choose $A$ like that. That's a problem I'm always facing with different proofs.
The proof argument here basically is
That if $\{a_n\}$ converges to limit a there will be an index $N_1$ from which upwards the sequence is bounded by the constant $1+|a|$
This is used then to imply the boundedness for all terms of the sequence $\{a_n\}$.
Since we know that there are only finitely many terms of the sequence (all $a_n$ with $n<N_1$) which possibly can be greater than the constant $1+|a|$, we have nothing more to do than to choose the maximum out of these numbers $a_1$ to $a_{N_1}$, $1+|a|$ and this will be an upper bound.