Proof for a property of finite perimeter

45 Views Asked by At

It’s on the book of Sets of Finite Perimeter and Geometric Variation Problems by Francesco, on Page 110. enter image description here enter image description here

My questions are:

  1. (12.19) Why here use the closure of $A$ rather than $A$?

  2. The definition of $A_k$, why $dist(x, \partial A) < 1/k$, rather than $>$?I think it should be limit to $A$.
    If it should be used $>$ here, why not use $A_k = A \cap B_k$?