This is form p. 46-47 from the Bartle's text. I don't understand one step in this proof. At the end of the proof, it says that "this integrand is dominated by $g(x)$". We know that $|\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{t}} (x,t) | \le g(x)$, but does this imply that $|\frac{f(x,t_n) - f(x, t)}{t_n - t}| \le g(x)$? I think that this is not necessarily true unless if we let n goes to infinity. If not true, we cannot use Dominated Convergence Theorem.
I appreciate if you explain the last step of this proof.
(By the way, $F(t) = \int_X f(x, t) d\mu(x)$.)


Since $t \mapsto f(x,t)$ is differentiable for all $(x,t) \in X \times [a,b]$ and $t_n,t \in [a,b]$ we can apply the mean value theorem which guarantees the existence of a point $\xi$ between $t_n$ and $t$ such that
$$\left|\frac{f(x,t_n) - f(x,t)}{t_n - t} \right| = \left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(x,\xi) \right| \leqslant g(x)$$
That $\xi$ may depend upon $x$ and $n$ is immaterial since the dominating function $g$ applies for any $t \in [a,b]$.