Suppose a torus $T=(\mathbb{C}^\ast)^n$ acts on a finite dimensional vector space $W$, and define for $m \in M$ ($M$ is the character lattice of $T$) the eigenspace $W_m$ by $$W_m = \{w \in W \mid t\cdot w = \chi^m(t)w \text{ for all }t \in T \}$$ i.e. for $w \in W_m$ is a simultaneous eigenvector for all $t \in T$, with eigenvalue $\chi^m(t)$ depending on $t \in T$. Then it is a famous fact $$W=\underset{m \in M} \bigoplus W_m$$ Can someone provide a somewhat self-contained proof of this result? I don't know much about the theory of algebraic groups.
2026-03-26 09:38:06.1774517886
proof of basic fact that torus actions are diagonalizable
1.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GROUPS
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- How to realize the character group as a Lie/algebraic/topological group?
- Action of Unipotent algebraic group
- From a compact topological group to a commutative Hopf algebra
- When do we have $C(G) \otimes C(G) =C(G\times G)?$
- What is the internal Hom object in the category $\mathcal{C} = \mathbf{Rep}_k(G)$?
- Is the product of simply connected algebraic groups simply connected?
- Connected subgroup of $(K^\times)^n$ of Zariski dimension 1
- Action of $ \mathbb{G}_m $ on $ \mathbb{A}^n $ by multiplication.
- Book recommendation for Hopf algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$\def\C{\mathbb{C}}$ My answer uses results from James Humphreys' Linear Algebraic Groups. I'll cite the pages which have the results I'm going to use because the proofs he gives are entirely self-contained and I would mostly be transcribing them otherwise.
The key idea is that the torus $(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}$ consists of commuting semisimple elements and that homomorphisms of algebraic groups preserve semisimplicity. This is all you need to know if you don't want to read the very long answer that follows.
For an algebraic group $G$ and an element $x \in G$, we say that $x$ is semisimple if the action of $x$ on the coordinate ring $\mathbb{C}[G]$ defined by $(x \cdot f(g)) = f(g\cdot x)$ can be diagonalized. Now, the coordinate ring of $(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}$ is $\mathbb{C}[x_{1}^{\pm}, \ldots, x_{n}^{\pm}].$ Now, if $r = (r_{1}, \ldots, r_{n})$ is an element of $(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}$ and $g$ is an arbitrary element of the same, then for any $a_{1}, \ldots, a_{n}$,
$$(r\cdot x_{1}^{a_{1}}\cdots x_{n}^{a_{n}})(g) = r_{1}^{a_{1}}\cdots r_{n}^{a_{n}}(x_{1}^{a_{1}}\cdots x_{n}^{a_{n}})(g).$$ Hence $$r \cdot x_{1}^{a_{1}} \cdots x_{n}^{a_{n}} = r_{1}^{a_{1}}\cdots r_{n}^{a_{n}} (x_{1}^{a_{1}}\cdots x_{n}^{a_{n}}).$$
Hence, each of the monomials in the coordinate ring of $(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}$ is an eigenvector for $r$. Thus, every element in $(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}$ acts diagonally on the coordinate ring and is hence semisimple.
The next result is found in page 99 of Humphreys, where he proves (among other things) that homomorphisms of algebraic groups preserve semisimplicty. That is, if $\rho: G \rightarrow G'$ is a morphism of algebraic groups and if $g \in G$ is semisimple, then $\rho(g)$ is semisimple in $G'.$
So now, if we have a representation $V$ of $(\C^{*})^n$, then we have a homomorphism $\rho: (\C^{*})^{n} \rightarrow GL(V)$ whose image consists entirely of semisimple elements. So now, we show that if an element $g \in GL(V)$ is semisimple then it acts diagonally on $V$. This will then imply that each element of $\rho((\C^{*})^{n})$ acts diagonally on $V$ as and hence the entire action can be simultaneously diagonalized since the operators also commute with each other.
To finish the proof, we use the multiplicative Jordan decomposition. This can be found on page 96 of Humphreys (and many other sources I would imagine.) This says that for any element $g \in GL(V)$, there exist $g_{s}, g_{u} \in GL(V)$ such that
So now, since $g_{s}$ is diagonalizable, it must act semisimply on $\C[GL(V)]$. This is because we let $x_{i, j}$ be coordinates for $GL(V) \cong M(n \times n)$ in the basis such that $g_{s}$ is diagonal, then $\C[GL(V)] = \C[X_{1,1}, \ldots, x_{n, n}]_{\det}$ and the elements of the form
$$\frac{x_{1, 1}^{a_{1, 1}}\cdots x_{n, n}^{a_{n, n}}}{\det^{l}}$$
form a spanning set in $\C[GL(V)]$ of eigenvectors for $g_{s}$ and hence for $g_{s}^{-1}.$ As $g$ also acts diagonally on $\C[GL(V)]$, and commutes with $g_{s}^{-1}$, the action of $g$ and $g_{s}^{-1}$ on $\C[GL(V)]$ must be simulataneously diagonalizable. Hence, $gg_{s}^{-1} = g_{u}$ must also act diagonally on $\C[GL(V)]$.
But $g_{u} - 1$ acts nilpotently on $\C[GL(V)]$ because its $m$th power is $0$. Hence, the action of $g_{u}$ in $\C[GL(V)]$ must have eigenvalue $1$ and is hence the identity. Since the representation of an algebraic group in its coordinate ring is faithful, this implies that $g_{u} = 1$ and hence $g = g_{s}$ is diagonalizable in $GL(V)$. This is what we needed.