According to exponential map, there also exist a logarithm map $$\log:SO(3) \to \mathfrak {so}(3).$$ Suppose a vector $t \in\mathfrak {so}(3)$ and $t=\|t\|w$, according to exponential map $$R = \cos\|t\|I+(1-\cos \|t\|)ww^T+\sin \|t\|w^{\land}.$$ So the inverse(i.e. from rotation matrix $R$ to vector $t$) is $$\|t\|=\cos^{-1}\left(\frac{\operatorname{Tr}(R)-1}{2}\right)\tag 1$$ $$w = \frac{1}{2\sin(\|t\|)} \begin{bmatrix} r_{32}-r_{23} \\ r_{13}-r_{31} \\ r_{21}-r_{12} \end{bmatrix} \tag 2$$ where $r_{ij}$ is elements of $R$. I can easily derive (1) while stuck in (2), can anyone help me out?
2026-03-26 09:41:11.1774518071
Proof of Logarithm map formulae from $SO(3)$ to $\mathfrak {so}(3)$
2.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in ROTATIONS
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- why images are related by an affine transformation in following specific case?(background in computer vision required)
- Proving equations with respect to skew-symmetric matrix property
- Finding matrix linear transformation
- A property of orthogonal matrices
- Express 2D point coordinates in a rotated and translated CS
- explicit description of eigenvector of a rotation
- Finding the Euler angle/axis from a 2 axes rotation but that lies on the original 2 axes' plane
- How to find a rectangle's rotation amount that is inscribed inside an axis-aligned rectangle?
- Change of basis with rotation matrices
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is a standard formula accompanying the Rodrigues rotation formula, obvious if only you use the right notation! The important thing is is to streamline your orthogonal matrix R. Its logarithm is the antisymmetric matrix K, defined by the linear cross product at the end of your expansion of R, $$ K\equiv \left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & -t_3 & t_2 \\ t_3 & 0 & -t_1 \\ -t_2 & t_1 & 0 \end{array}\right] ~, $$ so that $\| t\|^2= -\frac{\operatorname {Tr} (K^2)}{2}\equiv \| K\|^2$; hence $K=\|t\| \hat K$ with $\| \hat K\|=1$ .
Now the crucial thing is to re-express the Rodrigues formula in this notation, $$ R=(R^T)^{-1}= e^K= {\mathbb 1} + \sin \|t\| ~ \hat K + (1-\cos\|t\|) \hat K ^2 . $$ Note how different the coefficient of the identity looks, contrasted to your vector expression: it is not a mistake (read up on the point in WP.... well-wishers frequently "correct" it! Of course, this expression follows directly from the characteristic equation for K, not Rodrigues' original argument).
So, tracing this expression, and the fact that K is traceless since antisymmetric, your (1) follows.
Now antisymmetrize R, $$ \frac{R-R^T}{2}= \sin\|t\| ~ \hat K , $$ since the other two terms are symmetric matrices. Convert your "unit" antisymmetric matrix to your unit vector w and you have (2).