I found the following
Theorem
Let $p_n$ denote the $n$-th prime number.
$S_1= \sum_{n \in \Bbb N} \frac 1 {p_{2n}} = \infty$ and $S_2=\sum_{n \in \Bbb N} \frac 1 {p_{2n+1}} =\infty$.
Proof
If one of $S_1,S_2$ converges, then so does the other, but then $S = \sum_{n=1}^\infty p_n^{-1} < \infty$, which Euler showed that diverges, q.e.d.
I don't understand why the convergence of $S_1$ would imply the convergence of $S_2$. Could someone explain that bit?
You can always say that $p_{2n}\le p_{2n+1}$, hence $\frac{1}{p_{2n}}\ge \frac{1}{p_{2n+1}}$ and thus $$S_1=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{p_{2n}}\ge \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{p_{2n+1}}=S_2.$$
On the other hand, you have $p_{2n}\le p_{2n-1}$, which would imply that (recall that $p_1=2$) the
$$S_1=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{p_{2n}}\le \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{p_{2n-1}}=2+\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{p_{2n+1}}=\frac 12+S_2.$$
These two relations, together with that all terms in the sums are positive, imply that the series $S_1$ and $S_2$ diverge or converge simultaneously.
Suppose that $S_1$ and $S_2$ converge, then they converge absolutely, which allows to say that $$S_1+S_2 = -\frac 12 +\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{1}{p_n}=+\infty,$$ which leads to a contradiction.