The example states:
As an example, we prove that the Fibonacci numbers, F0 = 1, F1 = 1, F2 = 2, F3 = 3, F4 = 5,..., Fi = Fi - 1 + Fi - 2, satisfy Fi < (5/3)i, for all i >= 1. To do this, we first verify that the theorem is true for the trivial cases. It is easy to verify that F1 = 1 < 5/3 and F2 = 2 < 25/9; this proves the basis. We assume that the theorem is true for i = 1, 2,..., k; this is the inductive hypothesis. To prove the theorem, we need to show that Fk + 1 < (5/3)k + 1. We have Fk + 1 = Fk + Fk - 1
And I got all of that until they started on the the rest of the proof which goes like this:
Fk + 1 < (5/3)k + (5/3)k - 1
Got that...
Fk + 1 < (3/5)(5/3)k + 1 + (3/5)2(5/3)k + 1
Now I'm lost, but the the rest of the math makes sense up until the next to last step.
Fk + 1 < (3/5)(5/3)k + 1 + (9/25)(5/3)k + 1
which simplifies to
Fk + 1 < (3/5 + 9/25)(5/3)k + 1
Fk + 1 < (24/25)(5/3)k + 1
Fk + 1 < (5/3)k + 1
The two things I don't understand are how they got to the second step of the proof and how they eliminated the 24/25. I feel really dumb right now. Could some one show me what I'm missing?
First you can assume that $F_k < (5/3)^k$ and $F_{k-1} < (5/3)^{k-1}$ so.
$$F_{k+1} = \underbrace{F_{k}}_{<(5/3)^k}+\underbrace{F_{k-1}}_{< (5/3)^{k-1}} <(5/3)^k+ (5/3)^{k-1}$$
We can use $24/25 <1$ like so: $$F_{k+1} < \underbrace{24/25}_{<1} \cdot (5/3)^{k+1} < 1 \cdot (5/3)^{k+1}$$