I'm confused about the proof of a simple corollary.
We're given that if $f_n \to f$ uniformly then $$ \lim_{n \to \infty} \int_a^b f_n(x)\,dx = \int_a^b f(x)\,dx. $$
As a corollary, my textbook considers the case that if
- the sums $\sum_{k=1}^n g_k(x)$ converge uniformly
- the $g_k$ are Riemann integral on $[a,b]$
then $$ \int_a^b \left(\sum_{k=1}^\infty g_k(x)\right)\,dx = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \left(\int_a^b g_k(x)\,dx\right). $$
The proof defines $f_n(x) \triangleq \sum_{k=1}^n g_k(x)$ and states that the conclusion follows from the given since $$ \int_a^b f_n(x)\,dx \to \int_a^b f(x)\,dx. $$
This proof seems incomplete to me, however. How do we know that $$ \int_a^b f(x)\,dx = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \left(\int_a^b g_k(x)\,dx\right) \text{ ?} $$
$$ \begin{align*} \int_a^b \left(\sum_{k=1}^\infty g_k(x)\right)dx &= \int_a^b f(x)dx \\ &= \lim_{n \to \infty} \int_a^b f_n(x)dx\\ &= \lim_{n \to \infty} \int_a^b \left(\sum_{k=1}^n g_k(x)\right)dx\\ &= \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=1}^n \left(\int_a^b g_k(x)dx\right)\\ &= \sum_{k=1}^\infty \left(\int_a^b g_k(x)dx\right) \end{align*} $$
--- rk