Proof that Lipschitz condition guarantees well posedness of initial value problems

741 Views Asked by At

In the proof of the theorem which states that the Lipschitz condition guarantees well posed-ness of an initial value problem $y'=f(x,y)$, $y(x_0)=y_0$, I came across this

Let the perturbed problem be

$$ z'=f(x,z) + \delta(t) \\ z(x_0)=y_0 + \epsilon_0 $$

Let $\epsilon(x)=z(x)-y(x)$ and let $f$ satisfy the Lipschitz condition. Then we have

$$ \epsilon '=z'-y'=f(x,z)-f(x,y)+\delta(x)\\ \implies |\epsilon'(x)| \leq |f(x,z)-f(x,y)| + |\delta(x)|\\ $$

Let $\delta(x)$ have the maximum value $\epsilon$. Therefore, we get,

$$ |\epsilon'(x)| \leq |f(x,z)-f(x,y)| + \epsilon\\ \implies |\epsilon'(x)| \leq L|\epsilon(x)| + \epsilon $$

I don't understand the next step i.e. how is the above inequality integrated to give

$$ |\epsilon(x)| \leq \frac{\epsilon}{L} \left[ (L+1)e^{Lt}-1\right] $$

How is the inequality integrated?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On

Multiply through by $|\epsilon (x )|$ to get:

$|\epsilon'(x )\epsilon (x )|\leq L|\epsilon (x )|^2+\epsilon|\epsilon (x )|$

$\frac{1}{2}|(\epsilon^2(x))'|\leq L |\epsilon^2(x)|+\epsilon|\epsilon (x)|\leq L|\epsilon(x)^2|+\epsilon^2$

$\Rightarrow \frac {1}{2}\frac {d}{dx}(|\epsilon ^ 2( x ) | e ^ { -2Lx })\leq \epsilon^2e^{-2Lx}\Rightarrow\frac {1}{2}|\epsilon ^ 2( x ) | e ^ { -2Lx}\leq \frac{1}{2}|\epsilon ^ 2 ( 0) |+\frac{1}{2L}(\epsilon ^ 2)(1-e^{-2Lx}) $

$\Rightarrow |\epsilon ^ 2( x ) |\leq|\epsilon ^ 2( 0) |e^{2Lx}+\frac{1}{L}(\epsilon^2)(e^{2Lx}-1)\leq\epsilon^2e^{2Lx}+\frac{1}{L}(\epsilon^2)(e^{2Lx}-1)=\frac{\epsilon^2}{L^2}(L^2+Le^{2Lx}-L)$

still working on this, but it's quite close to the desired estimate.

0
On

It is more convenient to use the integral form: $$ y(x)=y_0+\int_0^x f\big(s,y(s)\big)\,ds $$ and $$ z(x)=y_0+\varepsilon_0+\int_0^x \big(\,f\big(s,z(s)\big)+\delta(s)\big)\,ds $$ and hence $$ z(x)-y(x)=\varepsilon_0+\int_0^x\delta(s)\,ds+\int_0^x\big(f\big(s,z(s)\big)-f\big(s,y(s)\big)\big)\,ds, $$ which implies that (for $x>0$) $$ \lvert z(x)-y(x)\rvert \le \lvert \varepsilon_0\rvert +\varepsilon x+ L\int_0^x\big|\,z(s)-y(s)\big|\,ds. \tag{1} $$ Now, let $w(x)=\int_0^x \big|\,z(s)-y(s)\big|\,ds$, so the above becomes $$ w'(x) \le \lvert \varepsilon_0\rvert +\varepsilon x+ L w(x) $$ or $$ \left(\mathrm{e}^{-Lx}w(x)\right)'=\mathrm{e}^{-Lx}\big(w'(x)-Lw(x)\big)\le \mathrm{e}^{-Lx}\big(\lvert\varepsilon_0\rvert +\varepsilon x\big). $$ Integrating the above in $[0,x]$ we obtain $$ \mathrm{e}^{-Lx}w(x)-w(0)=\frac{\lvert\varepsilon_0\rvert}{L}(1-\mathrm{e}^{-Lx}) +\varepsilon\mathrm{e}^{-Lx}\left(-\frac{x}{L}+\frac{1}{L^2}\right)-\frac{\varepsilon}{L^2} $$ or $$ \int_0^x\lvert z(s)-y(s)\rvert\,ds\le \frac{\lvert\varepsilon_0\rvert}{L}(\mathrm{e}^{Lx}-1) +\varepsilon\left(-\frac{x}{L}+\frac{1}{L^2}\right)-\frac{\varepsilon \mathrm{e}^{Lx}}{L^2}. $$ Using $(1)$ we obtain $$ \lvert z(x)-y(x)\rvert \le \lvert\varepsilon_0\rvert(\mathrm{e}^{Lx}-1) +\varepsilon\left(-x+\frac{1}{L}\right)-\frac{\varepsilon \mathrm{e}^{Lx}}{L}+\lvert\varepsilon_0\rvert +\varepsilon x =\cdots. $$