I really want to have help verify these properties of GCD:
Let $s,t \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $m,n$ be positive integers with $m\mid n$.
- If $\gcd(t,n)\mid\gcd(s,n)$, then $\gcd(t,m)\mid\gcd(s,m)$.
- If $\gcd(t,n)>\gcd(s,n)$, then $\gcd(t,m)\geq\gcd(s,m)$.
For 1, I know that $\gcd(t,m)\mid\gcd(t,n)$ and so by transitivity, $\gcd(t,m)\mid\gcd(s,n)$. Also, $\gcd(s,m)\mid\gcd(s,n)$ and so $\gcd(t,m)\cdot k = \gcd(s,m) \cdot t$ for some $k,t \in \mathbb{Z}$. I just really want to verify whether $\frac{k}{t}$ is an integer so that the conclusion follows.
For, 2, it is clear that the less than relation follows, but I can't understand the equality condition.
I hope someone will help me... Thank you!
For 1, let $x = \gcd(t, m)$. Clearly $x$ divides $m$. You have to prove that $x$ is also a divisor of $s$.
Since $x$ divides $m$, it also divides $n$, as $m \mid n$. Thus $x$ divides $t$ and $n$, and thus, by assumption, $x$ divides $s$ and $n$. In particular, it divides $s$, as requested.
On the other hand, 2 does not appear to be true as stated. Take $t = 3, s = 2, n = 6, m = 2$.
Then $$ 3 = \gcd(3, 6) = \gcd(t, n) > \gcd(s, n) = \gcd(2, 6) = 2, $$ but $$ 1 = \gcd(3, 2) = \gcd(t, m) < \gcd(s, m) = \gcd(2, 2) = 2. $$
Even if you exchange $m$ and $n$ in 2, as suggested in a comment, it won't work. Take $t = 2, s = 3, n = 6, m = 2$.
Then $$ 2 = \gcd(2, 2) = \gcd(t, m) > \gcd(s, m) = \gcd(3, 2) = 1, $$ but $$ 2 = \gcd(2, 6) = \gcd(t, n) < \gcd(s, n) = \gcd(3, 6) = 3. $$