Property holding almost everywhere implies existence of dense subset?

151 Views Asked by At

I'm working through some literature from Geometric Measure Theory for an assignment paper and have got stuck at a step in the proof of the Federer-Volpert theorem. The reasoning is as follows: according to the BV coarea formula, the level sets $\{u>t\}$ have finite perimeter for $\lambda$-a.e. $t \in \mathbb{R}$. From this, the author concludes that we can find a dense subset $D$ of $\{ t \in \mathbb{R} \ \vert \ \{u > t \} \ \text{has finite perimeter} \}$. I'm guessing this must follow from some well-known fact in measure theory, but I can't put my finger on it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

If $P(t)$ is any property that holds for almost every $t\in\mathbb R$, then $\{t\in\mathbb R:P(t)\}$ is dense in $\mathbb R$.

Proof. By assumption, $\lambda(\{t \in\mathbb R : \text{not}\ P(t)\}) = 0$, and hence $\{t\in\mathbb R : \text{not}\ P(t)\}$ contains no nontrivial interval $(a,b)$. Therefore, $\{t\in\mathbb R:P(t)\}$ intersects every nontrivial interval $(a,b)$, so it is dense. $\square$