Its known that if one variable is proportional to two others than it is also proportional to their product. $$\forall a,b,c\in ℝ:a\propto b\wedge a\propto c\Rightarrow a\propto b\cdot c$$ I think i`ve proven that if one variable is proportional to two others than its square is proportional to their product. But these two theorems would be in contradiction to each other so my proof have to contain a mistake. But where is the mistake? $$Assumption:\forall a,b,c\in ℝ:a\propto b\wedge a\propto c\Rightarrow { a }^{ 2 }\propto b\cdot c$$ $$a\propto b\wedge a\propto c\Rightarrow b=m\cdot a \wedge c=n\cdot a\Rightarrow b\cdot c=m\cdot n\cdot { a }^{ 2 }\Rightarrow { a }^{ 2 }\propto b\cdot c $$ Where $m$ and $n$ are parameters.
2026-04-06 06:25:39.1775456739
Proportionality between two quantities
44 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in RELATIONS
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Is a relation on which every element is related with itself alone transitive?
- Relation power composition
- Order relation proof
- Order relation proof ...
- How to identify if a given Hasse diagram is a lattice
- Is the relation < a strict total order?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Finding all reflexive binary relations of a set
- Showing that a relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
Related Questions in EQUIVALENCE-RELATIONS
- Relations of equivalence...
- Number of subsets, relations etc of a set
- Number of possible equivalence relations
- Why is $p(z) = \frac{e^z}{1 + e^z} \color{red}{\equiv} \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}}$ and not $=$?
- Simple question about relations
- Total number of equivalence class for a set
- Is this an equivalence relation and explaination?
- Partition of a set identified by a equivalence relation
- Define an equivalence relation on $\{ 1,2,3,4 \}^2$ by: (, )(, ) if ⋅ = ⋅ . How many equivalence classes are there?
- Prove that $\sum_{i=1}^n\lvert[a_i]\rvert$ is even iff $n$ is even
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There is no mistake. If the variable $a$ is proportional to the variable $b$, then $a=kb$ for some constant $k$. Similarly, $a=lc$ for some constant $l$. Thus $a^2=(kl)bc$, and therefore $a^2$ is proportional to $bc$. If $a$, $b$, and $c$ are positive, which they usually are, we can conclude that $a$ is proportional to $\sqrt{bc}$.
The assertion in the first displayed line is not correct. Perhaps you had the following correct result in mind. If $a\propto b$ and $b\propto c$, then $a\propto c$.