Prove through appropriate estimations with simple sets that the set
$$E =\{(x, y) ∈ ℝ^2 ∣∣ 0 ≤ y < e^x \quad \& \quad 0 ≤ x < h\}$$ has an area of $$e^h - 1.$$
I believe I have to represent the sets as Riemann sums of the upper and lower limits, which I have done the following way:
Lower: $$|F| =\sum_{k=1}^n e^\frac{h(k-1)}{n} \frac{h}{n}$$
Upper: $$|G| =\sum_{k=1}^n e^\frac{hk}{n} \frac{h}{n}$$
Now my question is: how do I simplify $$\sum_{k=1}^n e^\frac{h(k-1)}{n} \frac{h}{n}$$ and $$\sum_{k=1}^n e^\frac{hk}{n} \frac{h}{n}$$ to expressions where I can show that $$|F| → e^h - 1$$ $$|G| → e^h - 1$$ when n → infinity?$$$$ When I type in my two Riemann sums into Wolfram Alpha I don't get any good simplifications of the sums. What am I doing wrong? How would you approach this problem?
Substantial hint:
In $$\sum_{k=1}^n e^\frac{hk}{n} \frac{h}{n},$$ I'd notice that $h/n$ is a constant that could be taken out of the sum to get $$ \frac{h}{n} \sum_{k=1}^n e^\frac{hk}{n} $$
Then I'd notice that $$ e^\frac{hk}{n} = \left(e^\frac{h}{n}\right)^k $$ and perhaps rename the constant $e^\frac{h}{n}$ with a single letter like $b$, and see whether the resulting expression brought anything to mind.
In short: I'd spend some time doing some algebra, and avoid rushing to Wolfram Alpha every time I encountered an expression with more than a few symbols.