Prove that $\frac{n}{p}$ has an egyptian fraction expansion of length $2$ if and only if $n|(p+1)$ where $p$ is a odd prime and $n<p$.
2026-02-23 09:13:23.1771838003
Prove a sufficient condition for $\frac{n}{p}$ to have an egyptian fraction expansion of length $2$.
79 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in EGYPTIAN-FRACTIONS
- Sufficiently large integers can be partitioned into squares of distinct integers whose reciprocals sum to 1.
- Is there a close form for $g(a,b,n)=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\frac{1}{ak+b}$?
- Egyptian fractions with very large denominators
- Number of ways to sum two Egyptian fractions and satisfy a given inequality.
- Show Sylvester sequence is the smallest solution with n terms to sum of unit fractions equalling 1
- Egyptian fractions: does the greedy algorithm never give more fractions than absolutely necessary?
- Permutations, products, and unit fractions
- Egyptian Fraction when numerator is greater than denominator
- Product of sum of reciprocals
- Sum of reciprocals of odd numbers that add up to 1
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Extended HINT: The following examples should suggest an approach to proving that if $n\mid p+1$, then $\frac{n}p$ can be written as the sum of two Egyptian fractions:
$$\begin{align*} \frac2{11}&=\frac16+\frac1{66}\qquad\qquad\frac3{11}=\frac14+\frac1{44}\\\\ \frac4{11}&=\frac13+\frac1{33}\qquad\qquad\frac6{11}=\frac12+\frac1{22}\;. \end{align*}$$
For the other direction, suppose that
$$\frac{n}p=\frac1a+\frac1b=\frac{a+b}{ab}\;;$$
clearly $p\mid ab$, so without loss of generality we may assume that $a=pr$ for some $r\in\Bbb Z^+$, so that
$$\frac{n}p=\frac1{pr}+\frac1b=\frac{pr+b}{pbr}\;.$$
It follows that $brn=pr+b$ and hence that $b=rs$ for some $s\in\Bbb Z^+$. See if you can complete the proof from here. If you get completely stuck, I’ve done most of the rest in the spoiler-protected block below; mouse-over to see it.