If $f$ is continuous function ($f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$), then there exists a sequence of polynomials which converges to $f$ on any compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$.
Question: Since $K$ is compact, there exists some interval $[a,b]$, such that $K$ is contained in. By Weierstrass, for all $\epsilon>0$, there exits a sequence of polynomials of $P_n$, such that $P_n$ converges to $f$ uniformly, i.e. $\exists N\in\mathbb{N}$ $\forall n\geq N$, $|P_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon$, for all $x\in [a,b]$, therefore, certainly in $K$. So we are done. Correct?
Your hypothesis is not true!
We can find continuous real function $f_{0}$ such that $f_{0}$ not differentiable everywhere!
But as $f_{0}$ be the limit of a real polynomials at such interval $[a,b]$ then $f_{0}$ will be expanded by Taylor expansion, so $f_{0}$ is infinitely differentiable over $[a,b]$. Which contradict with the first property of $f_{0}$ which is: $f_{0}$ not differentiable everywhere.
let us define $g$ as following: \begin{equation} g(x)=x-E(x) \text{ if } E(x) \text{ is even}\\ g(x)=E(x)-x+1 \text{ if } E(x) \text{ is odd}\\ \text{where } E \text{ is the integer part function} \end{equation}
We can easily show that $g$ is continuous, periodic with period 2, and bounded, moreover norm of $g$ less than $1$.
Take the following function sequence: \begin{equation} g_{n}(x) =g(2^{n}x+1/2)/2^{n} \text{ for all } x\text{ in } \mathbb{R} \\ \text{for any positive integer } n \end{equation} We can easily show that $g_{n}$ is continuous, periodic with period 2^{-n+1}, and bounded, moreover norm of $g_{n}$ less than $1/2^{n}$, for every positive integer $n$.
Take the following function series: \begin{equation} S_{n}(x) =\sum_{i=0}^{i=n}g_{i}(x) \text{ for all } x\text{ in } \mathbb{R} \\ \text{for any positive integer } n \end{equation} We can easily show that $S_{n}$ is continuous for every positive integer $n$.
Therefore this series is converges by norm to a real continuous function S.
Let us find $B$ the set of all points where S is not differentiable Using the following steps:
$\mathbb{Z}$ is the set of all points where $g$ is not differentiable,see the definition of $g$.
let $A_{n}$ be the set of all points where $g_{n}$ is not differentiable. $g_{n}$ is not differentiable at the points $x$ such that $2^{n}x+1/2$ in $\mathbb{Z}$, which means $A_{n}=2^{-n}\mathbb{Z}-2^{-n-1}$. The must important think is $A_{i}\cap A_{j}=\phi$ for each two different positive integers $i,j$.
let $B_{n}$ be the set of all points where $S_{n}$ is not differentiable. \begin{equation} \text{let } x\in \bigcup_{u=0}^{u=n}A_{u}\\ x\in \bigcup_{u=0}^{u=n}A_{u} \Rightarrow x\in A_{u} \text{ for some } 0\leq u\leq n\\ \Rightarrow g_{u}\text{ is not differentiable at } x \text{ for some } 0\leq u\leq n \end{equation} since $A_{i}\cap A_{j}=\phi$ for each two different positive integers $i,j$: so we have $x$ doesn't belong to every $A_{v}$ where $0\leq v\leq n$ and $v\neq u$, that means $g_{v}$ differentiable at $x$ for every $0\leq v\leq n$ and $v\neq u$. Which gives: \begin{equation} \sum_{i=0}^{i=n}g_{i} \text{ is not differentiable at } x \text{, hence } S_{n} \text{ is not differentiable at } x.\\ S_{n} \text{ is not differentiable at } x \Rightarrow x\in B_{n} \end{equation} therefore: $B_{n}=\bigcup_{u=0}^{u=n}A_{u}$ ($\bigcup_{u=0}^{u=n}A_{u}\subseteq B_{n} $ has been proved; $B_{n}\subseteq \bigcup_{u=0}^{u=n}A_{u}$ is trivial inclusion). \begin{equation} \text{Then } B=\bigcup_{u=0}^{u=\infty}A_{u}. \end{equation}
In order to show that S is not differentiable every where we will show that: \begin{equation} (\forall \epsilon>0)(\forall a \in \mathbb{R})(S \text{ is not diff. over } ]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[) \end{equation}
Let us choose $a \in \mathbb{R}$. for each fixed $\epsilon>0$ the following is true:
We will choose $n_{0} \in \mathbb{N}^{*}$ such that $1/2^{n_{0}}<\epsilon$. Suppose $g_{n_{0}}$ is differentiable over $]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$, then $g_{n_{0}}$ is differentiable over $[a-\epsilon/2,a+\epsilon/2]$, then $g_{n_{0}}$ is differentiable over $[a-\epsilon/2,a+\epsilon/2]+m/2^{n_{0}}$ for all integer m (since $1/2^{n_{0}}$ is the period of $g_{n_{0}}$), then $g_{n_{0}}$ is differentiable over $\bigcup_{m=0}^{m=\infty} ([a-\epsilon/2,a+\epsilon/2]+m/2^{n_{0}})$, then $g_{n_{0}}$ is differentiable over $\mathbb{R}$ which isn't true. Therefore $g_{n_{0}}$ isn't differentiable over $]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$.
but: $g_{n_{0}}$ is not differentiable over $]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$, equivalent to say $\exists b \in ]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$ such that $g_{n_{0}}$ is not differentiable at $b$, equivalent to say $\exists b \in ]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$ such that $b \in A_{n_{0}}$, equivalent to say $\exists b \in ]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$ such that $b \in B$, equivalent to say $\exists b \in ]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$ such that $S$ is not differentiable at $b$, equivalent to say $S$ is not differentiable over $]a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon[$.
Finally $S$ isn't differentiable every where, $S$ is an example for $f_{0}$ continuous function not differentiable every where.