How do I prove that a condition for (Riemann) integrability is that the difference between the upper and lower sums of the regular partition $D_n:0=a_0<a_1<...<a_n=1$ where $a_k=(k/n)$ tends to 0 as n tends to infinity? I've tried used the Riemann criterion, so for all $ε>0$ there is a dissection $D$ such that the difference between the upper and lower sums of $D$ is less than $ε$, and this is fine in the case where $D$ is composed only of rationals, but I can't figure out how to make the argument rigorous in the case that $D$ may contain irrationals. Any help would be greatly appreciated! :)
2026-04-03 13:12:46.1775221966
Prove if a bounded function is integrable the difference between the upper sum and lower sum of the regular partition tends to 0.
2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in INTEGRATION
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- How to integrate $\int_{0}^{t}{\frac{\cos u}{\cosh^2 u}du}$?
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- Closed form of integration
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
Related Questions in RIEMANN-INTEGRATION
- Riemann Integrability of a function and its reciprocal
- How to evaluate a Riemann (Darboux?) integral?
- Reimann-Stieltjes Integral and Expectation for Discrete Random Variable
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- Proof verification: showing that $f(x) = \begin{cases}1, & \text{if $x = 0$} \\0,&\text{if $x \ne 0$}\end{cases}$ is Riemann integrable?
- prove a function is integrable not just with limits
- Intervals where $f$ is Riemann integrable?
- Understanding extended Riemann integral in Munkres.
- Lebesgue-integrating a non-Riemann integrable function
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First, it is a sufficient condition.
As long as $f$ is bounded on $[0,1]$, the upper and lower sums corresponding to arbitrary partitions are bounded. Let $\mathcal{P}$ denote the set of all partitions of $[0,1].$ Consequently, the sets $\{L(P,f): P \in \mathcal{P}\}$ and $\{U(P,f): P \in \mathcal{P}\}$ are bounded, and this guarantees the existence of
$$\underline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx = \sup_{P \in \mathcal{P}}\, L(P,f), \\ \overline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx = \inf_{P \in \mathcal{P}}\, U(P,f) , $$
which are called the lower and upper integrals.
Given any regular partition $D_n$ we have
$$L(D_n,f) \leqslant \underline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx \leqslant \overline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx \leqslant U(D_n,f).$$
The central inequality follows because for any partitions $P$ and $Q$ we have $L(P,f) \leqslant U(Q,f)$ (take a common refinement of the partitions to show this) and, thus $\sup_{P \in \mathcal{P}} \,L(P,f) \leqslant \inf_{Q \in \mathcal{P}} \,U(Q,f)$.
Hence,
$$0 \leqslant \overline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx - \underline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx \leqslant U(D_n,f) - L(D_n,f).$$
The right-hand side converges to $0$ as $n \to \infty$, by hypothesis, which implies that $f$ is integrable since we must have
$$\underline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx = \overline{\int}_0^1 f(x) \, dx, $$
where the common value of lower and upper integrals is by definition the value of the integral.
To show it is a necessary condition, consider
$$\left|U(D_n,f) - L(D_n,f) \right| \leqslant \left|U(D_n,f) - \int_0^1 f(x) \, dx \right| + \left|L(D_n,f) - \int_0^1 f(x) \, dx \right|.$$
The two terms on the RHS go to zero as $n \to \infty$. This is a consequence of the equivalent condition for integrability where for arbitrary Riemann sums corresponding to tagged partitions we have
$$\tag{*}\int_0^1 f(x) \, dx = \lim_{\|P\| \to 0} S(P,f).$$
Here $\|P\| = \max_{1 \leqslant j \leqslant n} (x_j - x_{j-1})$ is the norm of the partition $P = (x_0,x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ and, clearly, $\|D_n\| \to 0$ if and only if $n \to \infty$.
It takes a bit of effort to prove the equivalence of $(*)$ to the definition of the Riemann integral in terms of partition refinement or the Darboux approach. It has been shown a number of times on this site including here.