Prove no member of $S = \left\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{Q^+}, x^2 < 2 \right\}$ can be an upper bound for $S$.
So at first, I tried to prove that this statement was false; that a member of $S = \left\{x \mid x \in \mathbb{Q}, x^2 < 2 \right\}$ CAN be an upper bound for $S$.
Say $r \in S$, $r \in \mathbb{Q^+}$, and $r^2 < 2$. I can show there is a $r' \in \mathbb{Q^+}$ with $r' \in S$ and $r'^2 < 2$ such that $r' > r$.
Let $r' = \frac{4r}{r^2 + 2}$.
First, I prove that $r' > r$. $r' \in \mathbb{Q^+}$, so $r' > 0$. We know $r^2 < 2$, so $r^3 < 2r \rightarrow r^3 + 2r < 2r + 2r \rightarrow r^3 + 2r < 4r \rightarrow r(r^2 + 2) < 4r \rightarrow r < \frac{4r}{r^2+2} = r'$. So $r < r'$.
Next, I show that $r' \in S$. $r^2 < 2 \rightarrow (r^2 - 2)^2 > 0 \rightarrow r^4 - 4r^2 + 4 > 0 \rightarrow r^4 + 4r^2 + 4 > 8r^2 \rightarrow 2(r^4 + 4r^2 + 4) > 16r^2 \rightarrow 2 > \frac{16r^2}{r^4 + 4r + 4} = r'^2$, so $2 > r'^2$.
So since $r' \in S$, $r' \in \mathbb{Q^+}$, $r'^2 < 2$, and $r' > r \in S$, $r'$ is an upper bound for $S$.
But the statement (which is true) says that $r'$ cannot be an upper bound for $S$, although it feels like I have just shown it is. Where is my fallacy?
You have proven that given $r\in S$ you can find $r'\in S$, $r'>r$. This means that $S$ has not an upper bound.
To prove that $r'$ is an upper bound you should instead prove that all $r \in S$ satisfy $r<r'$.