Prove or disprove that the successive maxima of sums of i.i.d. increments are a Markov process

128 Views Asked by At

Let $\{\xi_n\}$ be independent, identically distributed, random variables. Define $S_k = \sum\limits_{i=0}^k \xi_i $ and $\eta_k = \max(S_0, ..., S_k)$. How to prove or disprove that $\{ \eta_k\}$ is a Markov process?

I have a feeling that $\{ \eta_k\}$ is not a Markov process, but don't know how to rigorously prove it.

My attempt

I think it is sufficient to show that assuming $\xi \sim U_{[-1/2 ; 1/2]}$ the following is true: $$ P\left(\eta_3 > \frac{1}{2} ~~\Big|~~ \eta_2 = \frac{1}{2} , \eta_1 = \frac{1}{2} \right)\neq P\left(\eta_3 > \frac{1}{2} ~~\Big|~~ \eta_2 = \frac{1}{2} \right) $$

The left part of the above is $$ P\left(\eta_3 > \frac{1}{2} ~~\Big|~~ \eta_2 = \frac{1}{2} , \eta_1 = \frac{1}{2} \right) = P\left(\xi_3 > -\xi_2 ~\Big|~ \xi_1 = \frac{1}{2}, \xi_2 < 0\right) $$ The right part is $$ P\left(\eta_3 > \frac{1}{2} ~~\Big|~~ \eta_2 = \frac{1}{2} \right) = P\left(\xi_3 > -\xi_2 ~\Big|~ \xi_1 = \frac{1}{2}, \xi_2 < 0\right) + P\left(\xi_3 > 0 ~\Big|~ \xi_1 + \xi_2 = \frac{1}{2}, \xi_1 < \frac{1}{2} \right) $$ And the problem is to prove that the last term $P\left(\xi_3 > 0 ~\Big|~ \xi_1 + \xi_2 = \frac{1}{2}, \xi_1 < \frac{1}{2} \right) $ is non zero

And it really seems, that it is non zero, because $\{\xi_3 > 0\}$ and $ \{\xi_1 + \xi_2 = \frac{1}{2}\}$ are independent.

Am i right ?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

Let $ p(x) = \mathbb{I}(x \in [-1/2;~ 1/2]) $, or equivalently $ \xi \sim U_{\left[-\frac{1}{2}; ~\frac{1}{2}\right]} $.

Consider probabilities: \begin{equation} \begin{gathered} P\left( \eta_3 > 0 ~\Big|~ \eta_1 = \dfrac{1}{2}, \eta_2 = \dfrac{1}{2} \right) = P\left( \xi_3 > -\xi_2 ~\Big|~ \xi_1 = \dfrac{1}{2},~ \xi_2 < 0 \right) = \\ = \int_{-1/2}^{0} \int_{-x_2}^{1/2} dx_3 dx_2 = \dfrac{1}{8} \end{gathered} \end{equation} \begin{equation} \begin{gathered} P\left( \eta_3 > 0 ~\Big|~ \eta_2 = \dfrac{1}{2} \right) = P\left( \eta_3 > 0 ~\Big|~ \underbrace{\left\{ \xi_1 = \dfrac{1}{2},~ \xi_2 < 0 \right\}}_{B} \cup \underbrace{\left\{ \xi_1 + \xi_2 = \dfrac{1}{2} \right\}}_{C} \right) \end{gathered} \end{equation} Note that $ P(B \cap C) = 0 $, so \begin{equation} \begin{gathered} P( \eta_3 > 0 ~|~ B \cup C ) = \dfrac{P(\eta_3 > 0 ~|~ B) P(B) + P(\eta_3 > 0 ~|~ C) P(C)}{P(B) + P(C)} = \\ = P(\eta_3 > 0 ~|~ C) = P\left(\xi_3 > 0 ~\big|~ \left\{ \xi_1 + \xi_2 = \frac{1}{2} \right\} \right) = \dfrac{1}{2} \end{gathered} \end{equation} So we have proved, that Markov property is not fulfilled for such a sequence. \begin{equation} P\left( \eta_3 > 0 ~\Big|~ \eta_1 = \dfrac{1}{2}, \eta_2 = \dfrac{1}{2} \right) \neq P\left( \eta_3 > 0 ~\Big|~ \eta_2 = \dfrac{1}{2} \right) \end{equation}