Let $m,n\in \mathbb{N}$ and let $V, W$ be $\ \mathbb{R}$-vector spaces with $\dim V=n$ and $\dim W=m$.
Let $f:V\rightarrow W$ be a linear map.
I want to prove or disprove the following:
There is a linear map $f:V\rightarrow W$ with the following properties:
- $f$ is injective, $n=3$, $m=4$.
- $\text{rang}(f)=6$, $\text{Nullity}(f)=5$, $m=11$.
- $f$ is surjective, $n=4$, $m=3$.
- $f$ is injective, $n=2$, $\text{rang}(f)=3$.
- $\text{Nullity}(f)=0$, $n=3$, $m=5$.
$$$$
I have done the following:
Since $f$ is injective, then $\text{ker}(f) = \{0\}$ and so $\dim\text{ker}(f) = 0$.
It holds that $\text{Im}(f)\subseteq W$. Therefore $\dim \text{Im}(f)\leq \dim W$.
From the Rank–nullity theorem we have that \begin{equation*}\dim V = \dim \text{ker}(f) + \dim \text{Im}(f)=\dim \text{Im}(f)\leq \dim W\end{equation*}
Therefore it cannot be that $n=4$ and $m=3$, right?
From the Rank–nullity theorem we have that \begin{equation*}\dim V=\text{Defekt}(f)+\text{Rang}(f)=5+6=11 \Rightarrow n=11\end{equation*} How do we use the information of $m$ ?
Since $f$ is surjective, it holds that $\text{Rang}(f)=W$.
From the Rank–nullity theorem we have that \begin{equation*}\text{Rang}(f)=\dim V-\text{Nullity}(f)\leq \dim V \Rightarrow \dim W\leq \dim V \Rightarrow m\leq n\end{equation*}
Therefore there can be a linear surjective map with $n=4$ and $m=3$, right?
Since $f$ is injective, it holds that $\text{ker}(f) = \{0\}$ and so $\dim\text{ker}(f) = 0$.
It holds that $\text{Nullity}(f)=\dim \text{ker}(f)=0$.
From the Rank–nullity theorem we have that \begin{equation*}\text{Rang}(f)=\dim V-\text{Nullity}(f) \Rightarrow 3=4-0 \Rightarrow 3=4\end{equation*} A contradiction.
Therefore there cannot be a linear surjective map with $n=2$ and $\text{Rang}(f)=3$, right?
Do we apply here the Rank–nullity theorem? But how?
For 1., you can consider $f\colon \mathbb R^3\to\mathbb R^4$ given by $$ f(x,y,z)=(x,y,z,0) $$ which is injective.
For 2., you can consider $f\colon \mathbb R^{11}\to\mathbb R^{11}$ given by $$ f(x_1,\ldots,x_{11})=(x_1,\ldots,x_6,0,\ldots,0), $$ since $\ker f$ equals the set of vectors of the form $(0,\ldots,0,x_7,\ldots,x_{11})$, which is $5$-dimensional.
For 3., you can consider $f\colon \mathbb R^4\to\mathbb R^3$ given by $$ f(x_1,\ldots,x_4)=(x_1,x_2,x_3), $$ which is surjective.
For 4., you can show it is impossible regardless of the value of $m$ - more generally, $\dim f(V)\leq \dim V$ regardless of the linear map $f$.
For 5., you can consider $f\colon \mathbb R^3\to\mathbb R^5$ given by $$ f(x_1,\ldots,x_3)=(x_1,x_2,x_3,0,0), $$ which is injective.
Notice my examples in 1., 3., and 5. had exactly the same form, namely $$ f\colon \mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R^m,\qquad f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=(x_1,\ldots,x_{\min(m,n)},0,\ldots,0). $$ You can see that $\ker f$ consists of all elements of $\mathbb R^n$ whose first $\min(m,n)$ entries are equal to zero, so $$ \dim\ker f=n-\min(m,n). $$ Similarly, $$ \dim f(\mathbb R^n)=\min(m,n). $$ The rank-nullity theorem holds because $$ \bigl(n-\min(m,n)\bigr)+\min(m,n)=n. $$ Moreover $f$ is injective iff $\dim\ker f=0$, i.e. $n=\min(m,n)$ which is equivalent to $n\leq m$. And $f$ is surjective iff $\dim f(\mathbb R^n)=m$, i.e. $\min(m,n)=m$ or equivalently $m\leq n$. Consequently $f$ is bijective if and only if $m=n$.