I'm trying to teach myself some number theory. In my textbook, this proof is given:
Example (2.3.1) Show that an integer is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of its digits is a multiple of 3.
Let $n=a_0a_1\ldots a_k$ be the decimal representation of an integer $n$. Thus $n=a_k+a_{k-1}10+a_{k-2}10^2+\cdots+a_010^k$ where $0\le a_i<10$ The key observation is that $10\equiv1\pmod3$, i.e., $[10]=[1]$. Hence $[10^i]=[10]^i=[1]$, i.e., $10^i\equiv1\pmod 3$. The assertion is an immediate consequence of this congruence.
I don't understand the last statement. Why does it follow from that congruence?
n = $a_0$ + .... + $a_n$ mod (3) means that n and the sum of the digits will be equivalent to the same number modulo 3. If this number is 0 then n and the sum of the digits will both be divisible by 3. If the number isn't 0 (or any other multiple of 3) neither n nor the sum of the digits will be divisible by 3.