In the linear algebra book I'm working through, we've already proved two related theorems, namely:
- $A: V\mapsto{W}$ is an isomorphism iff $Av_k = w_k$ where $v_1,...,v_n$ and $w_1,...,w_n$ are bases in $V$ and $W$ respectively.
- Let $A: V\mapsto{W}$ be a linear transformation. $A$ is invertible iff for any right side $b\in{Y}$ the equation $Ax = b$ has a unique solution $x\in{X}$.
The corollary: an $m$ by $n$ matrix is invertible iff its columns form a basis in $\mathbb F^n$ is then given without proof.
How can we show that the corollary is true from the two theorems above? I'm assuming it should be fairly intuitive since the proof is omitted, but I'm struggling to put the pieces together in a rigorous way.
There are many ways to think about it. Since the given theorems verse about linear transformations while your corollary about matrices, you should first keep in mind that any linear transformation $T$ has an associated matrix $A_T$ such that $[T (x)]_B = A_T [x]_B$ for a given basis $B $, from where it follows that the matrix $A_T $ is invertible iff $T$ is (or equivalently, iff $T $ is an isomorphism.) Also, isomorphisms can only be established between spaces of equal dimensions, so necessarily $m = n$ in your statement.
Consider the second theorem. If the columns of matrix $A $ do not form a basis of $\mathbb {R}^n $, then the columns of $A $:
1) are not linearly independent; and/or
2) do not span all $\mathbb{R}^n$
If 1) is the case, the solutions for $ A x = b $ are not unique; if 2) is the case, there are vectors $b $ for which the equation has no solutions. In both cases, A is not invertible (cause its associated linear transformation is not invertible.)