I had seen this proof at many places, but everywhere sylows theorem is used.
So is their any way to solve it without using sylows theorem?
I had seen this proof at many places, but everywhere sylows theorem is used.
So is their any way to solve it without using sylows theorem?
On
Sure. Instead of Sylow's theorems we can get normality of a subgroup by the following: if $p$ is the smallest prime dividing $|G|$ then any subgroup of index $p$ is normal in $G$ (you can consider this an exercise if you want, but a proof can be found here). For us, $|G|=15$ so $p=3$.
Now, there exists an element $g\in G$ of order $5$ (why?). This generates a subgroup $N$, and $N$ is normal by the above. Consider $G/N$, which is cyclic of order $3$. Pick some element $h\not\in N$. The cyclicity of $GN$ means that if $h\not\in N$ then $h^3\in N$.
Suppose $h^3\neq1$. Then $h$ has order $15$ and $G$ is cyclic (and hence abelian).
Suppose $h^3=1$. Then we have to use semidirect products: $G$ splits as a semidirect product $N\rtimes_{\phi}G/N$, where $\phi: G/N\rightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(N)$. Recalling all the isomorphisms, we have: $\mathbb{Z}_5\rtimes_{\phi}\mathbb{Z}_3$, where $\phi: \mathbb{Z}_3\rightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}_5)$. Now, $\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}_5)\cong\mathbb{Z}_4$ (why?) so $\phi$ is the trivial map. Hence, $G\cong \mathbb{Z}_5\times\mathbb{Z}_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_{15}$, and so $G$ is cyclic (and hence abelian).
I think Sylow's theorems are more low-level than semidirect products. It would be nice to see a proof which didn't use semidirect products :-)
On
Let $X_k$ be the set of elements of $G$ of order $k$. We know that $X_3,X_5$ are non-empty. Assume $X_{15}=\emptyset$. As distinct subgroups of prime order have trivial intersection, we conclude that $|X_5|$ is a multiple of $4$ and $|X_3|$ is a multiple of $2$. Thus $|X_3\cup X_5|=14$ is only possible if $(|X_3|,|X_5|)$ is one of $(2,12)$, $(6,8)$, $(10,4)$. In the first two cases, $|X_3|$ is not a multiple of $5$, hence the action by conjugation of any element $b\in X_5$ has a fixedpoint $a\in X_3$. In the last case, $|X_5|$ is not a multiple of $3$, hence the action by conjugation of any $a\in X_3$ has a fixedpoint $b\in X_5$. At any rate we have $ab=ba$, hence $(ab)^3=b^3\ne1$, $(ab)^5=a\ne 1$, contradiction.
We conclude that $X_{15}\ne\emptyset$ and hence $G$ is cyclic, in particular abelian.
Let $G$ be a group of order $15$. There exist an element $a$ of order $5$ and an element $b$ of order $3$. Now we consider $b^{-1}ab$, and we have $(b^{-1}ab)^5 = 1$. So $o(b^{-1}ab)\mid 5$, which implies $o(b^{-1}ab) = 1$ or $5$. It cannot be $1$, otherwise $ab = b$ and so $a = 1$, a contradiction. Thus $o(b^{-1}ab) = 5$.
We claim that $b^{-1}ab = a^m$ for some $m$. Otherwise $\langle a\rangle$, $\langle b^{-1}ab\rangle$, $\langle bab^{-1} = b^{-2}ab^2\rangle$ are three subgroups of $G$ of order $5$, each two of them intersect trivially. So we have $$G = \{1,a,\dots,a^4,b^{-1}ab,\dots,(b^{-1}ab)^4,b^{-2}ab^2,\dots,(b^{-2}ab^2)^4,b,b^2\}.$$ However, you may check that $ba$ is not in this set.
To check $ba\ne a^k,ba^kb^{-1},b^k$ is easy, we now check $ba\ne b^{-1}a^kb$.
For $k = 1$, we have $aba^{-1}=b^2=b^{-1}$, then $a^2b=ba^2$. Hence $b,a^2$ commutative and thus $b,a = (a^2)^3$ commutative.
For $k = 2$, $bababa = b^{-1}ab$ and so $b^{-1}ab = (ba^2ba)^2$, we have an element of order $10$, a contradiction.
For $k=3$, $baba = b^{-1}ab$ and so $(b^2ab^2)^2 = a$.
For $k = 4$, then $a^{-1}b^{-1} = (ba)^{-1} = b^{-1}ab$ and so $(ab^{-1})^2 = 1$.
Note that $o(b) = 3$, and so $m^3\equiv 1\pmod 5$. The only solution of that equation is $m\equiv 1\pmod 5$. Therefore, $b^{-1}ab = a$. Now $ab$ is of order $15$, $G = \langle ab\rangle$ is cyclic.