I know that if a pime q|a^2^m+1 and q divides a^2^n+1 then q divides their sum and difference but i don't know how to proceed further. please help
2026-03-27 06:51:58.1774594318
Prove that if $a,m,n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$ and $m \ne n$ then $\gcd(a^{2^m}+1,a^{2^n}+1)$ is 1 if a is even and 2 if a is odd.
75 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GCD-AND-LCM
- How do I show that if $\boldsymbol{a_1 a_2 a_3\cdots a_n \mid k}$ then each variable divides $\boldsymbol k $?
- GCD of common divisors in integral domain
- How do I solve this difficult gcd question?
- Fractions of the form $\frac{a}{k}\cdot\frac{b}{k}\cdot\frac{c}{k}\cdots=\frac{n}{k}$
- Why can't be a number the gcd of two numbers?
- Prove that if $\gcd(m, n) > 1$, then there do not exist integers $x, y$ so that $mx + ny = 1$.
- Least number of cuts to share sausages equally
- For $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ , $\deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Z}_q}(f, x^p - 1)) \geq \deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Q}}(f, x^p - 1))$
- GCD as linear combination of two numbers
- A question regarding greatest common divisor
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Applying this answer: wlog $\,m < n\,$ so $\,d = (2^m,2^n) = 2^m,\ b = 1,\ c = 2^{n-m}.\ $ Thus $\,2\nmid b-c\,$ so the formula there implies that the gcd $ = (a^d+1,2) = 1$ if $a$ is even, and $2$ if $a$ is odd.
Alternatively a more direct proof follows as below (from this answer on Fermat numbers).
${\bf Hint}\rm\quad\ \ \gcd(c+1,\,\ c^{\large 2k}\!+1)\ =\ gcd(c+1,\:2)$
${\bf Proof}\rm\ \ \ mod\ c+1\!:\,\ c^{\large 2k}\!+1\: \equiv\ (-1)^{\large 2k}\!+1\:\equiv\ 2,\ \ {\rm by}\ \ c\equiv -1\quad {\bf QED}$
Specializing $\rm\,\ c=a^{\large 2^{\Large M}},\ \ 2k = 2^{\large \,N-M}\ \Rightarrow\ c^{\large\, 2k} = a^{\large 2^{\Large N}}\ $ immediately yields your claim.
Remark $\ $ Aternatively, one could employ that $\rm\:c^{\large 2k}\!+1\, =\, (c^{\large 2k}-1) + 2\:\equiv\: 2\pmod{c+1}\ $
by $\rm\ c+1\ |\ c^{\large 2}-1\ |\ c^{\large 2k}\!-1.\, $ But this requires some ingenuity, whereas the above proof does not, being just a trivial congruence calculation using the modular reduction property of the $\rm\:gcd,\:$ namely $\rm\ \gcd(a,b)\, =\, \gcd(a,\:b\ mod\ a),\:$ a reduction which applies much more generally. $ $ Said equivalently, the result follows immediately by applying a single step of the Euclidean algorithm. Notice how abstracting the problem a little served to greatly elucidate the innate structure.