It is known the conjugate closure of a subgroup $H$, $H^G$, contains $H$. But the conjugate closure can be interpreted as the union of all the conjugates of $H$. The question is
If it is given for all $x \in G$, $xHx^{-1} \subset H$, then is it true that $xHx^{-1} = H$ for all $x \in G$?
I am not sure this is the case.
This is true. Take any $h \in H$. Which element of $H$ gets mapped to $h$ via conjugation? It is the element $y = x^{-1}hx$.
Now, how do we know that $y$ is actually in $H$? Because
$$h^{-1} \in H$$
$$\implies x h^{-1} x^{-1} \in H$$
$$\implies (x h^{-1} x^{-1})^{-1} \in H$$
$$\implies x^{-1}hx \in H$$