Prove that if sequence does not tend to infinity, then it has a bounded subsequence?

616 Views Asked by At

I need to prove that that if sequence does not tend to infinity, then it has a bounded subsequence. I have tried to divide my problem into 2 subcases. 1) when my sequence is bounded, by Bolzano-Weierstrass I can prove that it has a bounded subsequence. 2) when my sequence is unbounded, it also has 2 subcases. I do contradiction and assume that there is no subsequence which is bounded. Either my subseqences tend to infinity or they do not have a limit. I'm stuck at this point. What would you suggest to do next? enter image description here

1

There are 1 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

In my opinion it is useless to divide the problem in these two subcases because if sequence is bounded obviously it has bounded subsequence (it itself is its own sub-sequence).

I suggest a solution: let's assume that there is sequence $(a_n)$ which does not tend to infinity. It means that the following is not true:

$$\forall N > 0\, \exists n: \forall k > n \, |a_k| > N.$$

The opposite of the logical expression is $$\exists N > 0\, \forall n: \exists k > n \, |a_k| \leq N.$$ Let's construct bounded subsequence. We will fix the $N$ from expression and for the first element one can take $a_{k_1}$ such that $k_1 > 1,|a_{k_1}| \leq N$ (indeed it exists because one can put 1 instead of $n$ in expression $\exists N > 0\, \forall n: \exists k > n \, |a_k| \leq N$). For the next term we will get $a_{k_2}$ such that $k_2>k_1,a_{k_2} \leq N$. Continuing the process we will have bounded subsequence.