In this question, the top answer shows how to prove that $T(n) = O(n^2)$, but not that $T(n) = \Omega(n^2)$. I am struggling with this last half of the proof.
This is what I get when I try to prove it:
$$ \begin{align} T(n)&= T(n-1)+cn\\ &\geq k(n-1)^2+cn\\ &=kn^2 - 2kn + k + cn \end{align} $$
In order for the proof to work, we need $kn^2 - 2kn + k + cn \geq kn^2$. I try to prove this below:
$$ \begin{align} kn^2 - 2kn + k + cn &\geq kn^2 \\ -2kn + k + cn &\geq 0 \\ k(-2n + 1) &\geq -cn \\ k(2n - 1) &\leq cn \\ k &\leq c* \frac{n}{2n-1} \\ \end{align} $$
I know that the RHS of this equation will always be greater than $\frac{c}{2}$. Thus, if we choose any $k \leq \frac{c}{2}$, that last statement will always be true, and the chain of logic proves $T(n) \geq kn^2$ (thus completing our proof).
Does this look correct?
The main idea seems correct, though you made a slight mistake in the beginning, so I would recommend writing out exactly what properties you are using to prove both of these lines: $$T(n) = T(n-1) + cn$$ $$ \geq k(n-1)^2 + cn .$$
One is incorrect and the other is a part of your strategy.