I am trying to prove that a maximal outerplanar graph $G$ with $n \ge 3$ vertices cannot be bipartite. Intuitively, I think that all the inner faces will be triangles, thus forming odd length cycles, but I am not sure how to formalize that fact. Any ideas will be greatly appreciated!
2026-03-25 13:05:08.1774443908
Prove that maximal outerplanar graphs are not bipartite
128 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in PLANAR-GRAPHS
- max planarity and triangulation
- How to find a minimal planar covering of a graph
- Complete bipartite planar graphs
- Is graph Planar?
- Kuratowski's theorem on Planar graphs
- Graph Theory: Degree of regions in a planar graph
- On the Hex/Nash connection game theorem
- Graph Theory: There is only one planar graph with all vertices of degree 4 and 10 regions
- Intersection of circles and regions
- Which of these graphs is planar?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You are on the right track, you are just missing the start of the argument that there need to be inner faces at all.
Assume you have a maximal outerplanar graph with $n\ge 3$ vertices. It obviously has to be connected to be maximal. It can't be a tree either, as a tree has actually no inner faces (no cycles) and thus you can just add any (not yet existing) edge and still have an outerplanar graph (this requires $n\ge 3$, as there simply aren't any edges you can add to the graph of 2 vertices and one edge).
Now that we know there must be a cycle in the graph, your arguments kicks in. The area enclosed by the cycle is the union of one or more inner faces. Take one of them. If it is a triangle, the graph can't be bipartite. If it is a $k$-gon with $k \ge 4$, you can take any diagonal of it and add it to the graph. It's still outerplanar, as you didn't add any vertices and didn't change the outer face at all.