Here, under the section 'Regular and Singular Cardinal', there is this sentence 'Assuming the Axiom of Choice, $\omega_{\alpha+1}$ is regular for each $\alpha$' . May I know how to prove this? Also, if we don't assume AC, does the statement hold?
2026-03-29 07:22:18.1774768938
Prove that $\omega_{\alpha+1}$ is regular
75 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in CARDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- If $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal then $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \max\{\kappa, 2^{<\kappa}\}$
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- On finding enough rationals (countable) to fill the uncountable number of intervals between the irrationals.
- Is the set of cardinalities totally ordered?
- Show that $n+\aleph_0=\aleph_0$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- What is the cardinality of a set of all points on a line?
- Better way to define this bijection [0,1) to (0,1)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are several ways to define regularity. You can do it using order preserving functions; or you can do it using partitions. I like working with the partitions, for this proof.
For example $\aleph_\omega$ is not regular, since we can partition it into parts of size $\aleph_n$ for each $n\in\omega$, the partition is small and all its parts are small.
Now using the axiom of choice, the union of $\aleph_\alpha$ sets of size $\aleph_\alpha$ has size $\aleph_\alpha$ (we use the axiom of choice to choose an enumeration for each set, if the enumeration is given then we don't need the axiom of choice). Therefore, if we partition $\aleph_{\alpha+1}$ into less than $\aleph_{\alpha+1}$ parts, we can assume that we partitioned it into $\aleph_\alpha$ of them, and if each part has size $<\aleph_{\alpha+1}$ then we might as well assume that each part has size $\aleph_\alpha$.
But then now taking union of all these parts we only covered $\aleph_\alpha$ elements, not $\aleph_{\alpha+1}$.
As for the axiom of choice, yes. It is consistent that $\omega_1$ is the countable union of countable sets. In particular this means that it might not be regular without the axiom of choice. Assuming additional axioms to be true, Moti Gitik shown that it is consistent that every infinite cardinal is the countable union of smaller cardinals. So $\omega$ is the only [infinite] cardinal that is regular.