This question is inspired by Prove that $\prod_{1\leq i,j\leq n}\frac{1+a_ia_j}{1-a_ia_j}\geq1$ for $n$ real numbers $a_i\in(-1,1)$.
Let $(a_i)$ be a sequence of real numbers that satisfy $0 < |a_i| < 1,i=1,\ldots,n$. Then we want to prove that $$\sum_{i,j=1}^n \frac{a_ia_j}{1 - a_i^2a_j^2}\geq 0.$$
I know how to solve this using the geometric series: since $a_i^2a_j^2 < 1$ we have using the geometric series that $$ \sum_{i,j=1}^n \frac{a_ia_j}{1 - a_i^2a_j^2} = \sum_{i,j=1}^n a_ia_j\sum_{k=0}^\infty(a_ia_j)^{2k}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty\sum_{i,j=1}^na_i^{2k+1}a_j^{2k+1}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty\left(\sum_{i=1}^na_i^{2k+1}\right)^2\geq 0. $$
My question is whether we can solve this using another method that does not involve the geometric series.
My first approach is to somehow split the denominator into two terms involving $a_i$ and $a_j$ individually, so that I can turn the sum into a quadratic form. I can see that $1-a_i^2a_j^2 = (1 - a_ia_j)(1 + a_ia_j)$, but this sort of splitting is not helpful since each term contains both $a_i$ and $a_j$, and is antisymmetric. So, I'm wondering if there even exist $b_i,b_j>0$ such that $b_ib_j = 1 - a_i^2a_j^2$ for all $i,j$.
Another approach would perhaps be to represent the fraction as an integral? Or maybe even represent the denominator as a double integral. Involvement of complex numbers can also be an option.
I personally think that there isn't a better, cleaner way to solve this, but it's been bothering me for quite some time now.
Let $|b_i| < 1$, $i=1,\ldots,n$ and define the quadratic form $Q$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ by
$$ Q(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{i,j=1}^{n} \frac{x_i x_j}{1 - b_i b_j}. $$
Also, let $T = \operatorname{diag}(b_1, \ldots, b_n)$. Then
$$ Q(\mathbf{x}) = \left( \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i \right)^2 + Q(T\mathbf{x}) \geq Q(T\mathbf{x}). \tag{*} $$
From this, we get
$$ Q(\mathbf{x}) \geq Q(T^k\mathbf{x}) \xrightarrow{k\to\infty} Q(\mathbf{0}) = 0, $$
showing that $Q$ is positive semi-definite. Now OP's case follows by plugging $b_i = a_i^2$ and $x_i = a_i$ into $Q(\mathbf{x})$.
Remark. This is essentially the proof using geometric series in disguise. So I am not fully satisfied with this.