Let k and n be positive integers satisfying 1 $\le$ k < n. Prove that there do not exist n irrational numbers so that no matter how we choose k of them, their sum is always rational.
First off, I'm a bit confused as to how the question is worded, but my interpretation is this: For a finite set of any n irrational numbers, there is always a subset of size k such that those numbers will add up to be irrational.
Given that interpretation, I attempted to used induction, but was only able to prove the base case where n=2 and k=1. This problem is in my textbook under the chapter about Ramsey Theory, so I've been trying to think of how to represent the problem in terms of a graph, but I'm struggling mightily. Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
Suppose the sum of any two is rational, and pick three numbers $a,b,c$. Then $$a=\frac12((a+b)+(a+c)-(b+c))$$ is rational, contradicting the premise.
Similarly, suppose the sum of any three is rational, and pick four numbers $a,b,c,d$. Then $$a=\frac13((a+b+c)+(a+b+d)+(a+c+d)-2(b+c+d))$$ is rational, again a contradiction.
This pattern continues; for general $k$, we pick $k+1$ numbers $a,\ldots,z$ and then
$$a=\frac1k(\Sigma-(k-1)T)$$ where $\Sigma$ is the sum of the $k-1$ terms that include $a$, and $T=b+\cdots+z$ is the single term that doesn't include $a$. $\Sigma$ and $T$ are rational, so $a$ must be rational.