Given a connected graph, how can we prove that the number of edge of its minimum edge cover plus its maximum matching is equal to the number of vertices?
2026-03-26 02:56:13.1774493773
Prove that the sum of minimum edge cover and maximum matching is the vertex count
7.1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in MATCHING-THEORY
- Prove that a simple connected graph has even numbers of vertex
- Lexicographical covering of boolean poset
- Cantor-Bernstein-Schröder Theorem: small proof using Graph Theory, is this correct?
- All stable matchings of a given bipartite graph cover the same vertices.
- Maximum matching saturating a vertex
- Triangle inequality and graphs (min cost matching graph)
- Stable-Matching Algorithm with film upgrades
- Need help understanding stable matching proof
- Graph Theory - Matching
- Solving Quadratic program for finding perfect matching in polynomial time
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Given a graph $G$, let $\rho^*$ and $m^*$ denote the minimum edge cover and the maximum matching of $G$ respectively. We prove $|\rho^*| + |m^*| \leq n$ and $|\rho^*| + |m^*| \geq n$ in order below, where $n$ is the # of vertices in $G$.
Let $S$ be the set of vertices that are not contained in $m^*$. It is easy to see that $S$ is an independent set of $G$; otherwise, we can further enlarge $m^*$, contradicting the fact that $m^*$ is a max matching. We construct an edge cover $\rho'$ of $G$ by adding one of $v$'s adjacent edges to $\rho'$ for each $v \in S$ and adding all edges in $m^*$ to $\rho'$. The resulting $\rho'$ would cover all vertices in $G$ and $|\rho'| = |m^*| + |S|$. Therefore, $$ |m^*| + |\rho^*| \leq |m^*| + |\rho'| = 2|m^*| + |S| = n \tag{$\spadesuit$} $$
If $\rho^*$ is a minimum edge cover, then the edges in $\rho^*$ do not contain a path of length of more than $2$. This is because if a path of length of $>2$ exists, we can remove one of intermediate edges to shrink $\rho^*$, which is a contradiction. Therefore, the connected components of $\rho^*$ are all star graphs. Denote the # of connected components in $\rho^*$ as $c$ and the components as $C_1, C_2, \cdots, C_c$. We have $$ |V(C_1)| + |V(C_2)| + \cdots + |V(C_c)| = n $$ and $$ |E(C_1)| + |E(C_2)| + \cdots + |E(C_c)| = |\rho^*| $$ For a star graph, the # of edges is always $1$ less than the # of vertices; i.e., $|E(C_i)| = |V(C_i)| - 1$. Therefore, $$ |\rho^*| + c = n $$ and thus $$ |\rho^*| + |m^*| \geq |\rho^*| + c = n \tag{$\clubsuit$} $$ Combinging $(\spadesuit)$ and $(\clubsuit)$, we obtain $$ |\rho^*| + |m^*| = n $$