This problem is from 'A Survey of Modern Algebra' - Garret Birkoff, and Saunders Mac Lane in Section 1.9.
I'm an autodidact and there are no answers in the back so I need you guys to look at my proofs every once in a while to verify them. As you might be able to tell from my previous posts my mathematical maturity is not too high so I appreciate your patience. I give you permission to laugh at this post from 6 months ago but I'm getting better.
The truth of the congruence $X^2 \equiv 35 \pmod{100}$ can be inferred from looking at $100|(x^2-35)$ which has the equivalent of saying $100k = x^2 -35$ for some $k \in \Bbb{Z}$
by basic algebra $ x^2 =100k + 35 $ which I will now write as a function of k and attempt an induction.
Let
$P(k) = 100k + 35$
$P(0) = 35$ which is not a square.
$P(k+1) = 100(k + 1) + 35 = 100k + 100 +35 = (100k + 35) + 100$
by substitution from the induction hypothesis $ P(0) + 100 = 35 + 100 = 135 $
which is also not a square. Q.E.D.
$X^2=100k+35=4(25k)+35=4(25k+8)\color{red}{+3}$.