One of the way to define tangent space is to use directional derivative. However, it's not clear at the first glance that the directional derivative operators form a vector space. Let $D$ be the set of all directional derivative operators at $p \in M$ where $M$ is a n dimensional manifold. So I was wondering, rigorously speaking, how to prove that $$a\frac{d}{d\lambda}+b \frac{d}{d\eta} \in D$$
2026-04-30 10:47:22.1777546042
Prove the directional derivative operators at a point on manifold form a vector space
932 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Hint: Note that directional derivative can be written as $$\nabla_u:=u\cdot\nabla$$ So we take $\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}$ as bases, $$\sum_iu_i\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}$$ forms all directional derivatives.
Addition: If you speak of Spacetime and Geometry, as you said, the author wants to show linear combination of directional derivatives is also directional derivative, in which case the set of directional derivatives is closed under scalar multiplication and addition and thus forms vector space. So to prove an operator is derivative operator, two conditions are required. They are linearity and following Leibniz rule. Usually when defining tangent space of smooth manifold where differential operators live, we don't want to adapt the classical definition that $\frac{\partial f(p)}{\partial x}=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(p+\hat xh)-f(x)}h$ because the point $p+\hat xh$ may not lie on the manifold. In other word, traditional definition of derivative needs ambient space which may not exists in smooth manifold. Hence abstractly, we call operators with those two properties differentials. Return back to what you ask, the author proves linear combination of two differentials satisfies those properties and concludes new operator is indeed a directional derivative.