Proving a function $f:\mathbb{Z}_{nm} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_n \times \mathbb{Z}_m$ is an isomorphism

120 Views Asked by At

Let $n,m$ be two coprime numbers. Prove that the function $f:\mathbb{Z}_{nm} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_n \times \mathbb{Z}_m$ such that $f(\overline{r})=(\overline{r},\overline{r})$ is an isomorphism between rings.

I've already proven that $f$ is an homomorphism but I'm struggling with the bijectivity part.

Surjectivity:

We have to prove that for any $(\overline{a},\overline{b}) \in \mathbb{Z}_n \times \mathbb{Z}_m$ there exists $\overline{r} \in \mathbb{Z}_{nm}$ such that $(\overline{r},\overline{r})=(\overline{a},\overline{b})$. But I don't know how to find such $\overline{r}$. However there are two requirements that such $\overline{r}$ has to meet:

$\overline{a}=\overline{r} \iff a \equiv r \pmod n \iff a-r = c_1 n$

$\overline{b}=\overline{r} \iff b \equiv r \pmod m \iff b-r = c_2 m$

But I don't really know how to continue from here.

Injectivity:

We have to prove that if $\overline{a} \neq \overline{b} \implies (\overline{a},\overline{a})\neq(\overline{b},\overline{b})$. However I don't see why two elements of $\mathbb{Z}_{nm}$ being different implies they are different in both $\mathbb{Z}_{n}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_{m}$.

4

There are 4 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

You first have to prove the map is well defined.

Define $$ g\colon\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}_n\times\mathbb{Z}_m \qquad g(r)=(\bar{r},\bar{r}) $$ This is a ring homomorphism with no assumption on $m$ and $n$. The kernel is $$ \ker g=\{r\in\mathbb{Z}:r\in n\mathbb{Z}\cap m\mathbb{Z}\}=k\mathbb{Z} $$ where $k=\operatorname{lcm}(n,m)$, by well known results on ideals in the ring of integers. Granted that $n$ and $m$ are coprime (which probably is what your exercise tells you), you have $\operatorname{lcm}(n,m)=nm$.

The homomorphism theorem therefore provides a unique injective ring homomorphism $$ f\colon\mathbb{Z}_{nm}\to\mathbb{Z}_n\times\mathbb{Z}_m $$ such that $f(\bar{r})=g(r)=(\bar{r},\bar{r})$.

Since $f$ is injective and domain and codomain have the same number of elements, $f$ is also surjective.

0
On

Surjectivity, in particular, $n,m$ are relatively prime. $um+vn=1$ implies that $r=anv+bmu$.

Injectivity, $(\bar r,\bar r)=(\bar 0,\bar 0)$ implies that $r(um+vn)=r=0$ mod $m$ this implies that $rvn=0$ mod $m$ and $m$ divides $rv$, we deduce that $m$ divides $r$, since $m$ cannot divides $v$ since $um+rv=1$.

0
On

Since you already proved that $f$ is an homomorphism, we need to find $\ker f=\{0_{nm}\}$ to prove that $f$ is injective. So let $x_{nm}\in \ker f$, we have $f(x_{nm})=(x_n,x_m)=(0_n,0_m)\iff x$ is multiple of $n$ and $m$ and then multiple of $lcm(n,m)=nm$. Hence $\overline x=0_{nm}$. Now, since the cardinals of $\Bbb Z_{nm}$ and $\Bbb Z_n\times \Bbb Z_m$ are equal, $f$ is then bijective.

0
On

Show that every element of $\mathbb Z_{mn}$ can be written uniquely in the form $am+bn$, with $0\le a<n$ and $0\le b < m$. To do this, you need only show that all of the elements of the form $am+bn$ are distinct modulo $mn$, for $0\le a<n$ and $0\le b<m$. Once you've shown that, you know the map $f$ is of the form $f(am+bn)=(a,b)$, which is clearly bijective.

Given two such numbers, $am+bn$ and $cm+dn$, then if these were equivalent modulo $mn,$ you would have $$ (a-c)m\equiv (d-b)n\pmod{mn} $$ which implies that for some integer $k$, $$ (a-c)m = (d-b)n + kmn $$ The RHS is divisible by $n$, so the LHS is as well. Since $m$ and $n$ are coprime, this implies $n$ divides $a-c$, which since $a,c\in [0,n)$ implies $a=c$. Rearraning the equation to $$ (a-c)m -kmn= (d-b)n $$ allows you to use the same logic to conclude $d=b$, proving uniqueness.