Consider the function $f(x):[0,1]\rightarrow[0,1]$ given by $$\begin{cases}2x & 0 \leq x \leq\frac{1}{2}\\x-\frac{1}{2 } &\frac{1}{2}< x\leq 1 \end{cases}$$ I found the measure with density given by $\rho=\frac{4}{3}\chi_{[0,\frac{1}{2}]}+\frac{2}{3}\chi_{(\frac{1}{2},1]}$ (with respect to Lebsegue measure) is invariant for this transformation. My question now is: how can I prove this system with this measure is ergodic? I thought to use the approach with invariant functions and Fourier series, but I'm not sure on how to write Fourier expansion with a measure different than Lebesgue's. I also thought to exploit a possible conjugacy with symbolic shift, but wasn't able to prove that $[0,\frac{1}{2}]$ and $(\frac{1}{2},1]$ constitute a Markov partition of the unit interval. Any ideas?
2026-04-02 19:42:44.1775158964
Proving a transformation of the interval is ergodic
74 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- How to analyze a dynamical system when $t\to\infty?$
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
- Including a time delay term for a differential equation
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Condition for symmetric part of $A$ for $\|x(t)\|$ monotonically decreasing ($\dot{x} = Ax(t)$)
Related Questions in ERGODIC-THEORY
- the mathematics of stirring
- Kac Lemma for Ergodic Stationary Process
- Ergodicity of a skew product
- Is every dynamical system approaching independence isomorphic to a Bernoulli system?
- Infinite dimensional analysis
- Poincaré's Recurrence Theorem
- Chain recurrent set is the set of fixed points?
- Is this chaotic map known?
- A complex root of unity and "dense" property of the its orbit on the unit circle
- Books on ergodic operators
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
They gave as the exact same question in the course "introduction to analysis", as an example for uses for Fourier series, so the solution is bases on Fourier series.
Let's take $f : \Bbb R \rightarrow \Bbb C $ periodic and continuous such that $\int_{0}^{2\pi} |f(x) - f \circ T(x)|^2 = 0 $, we want to show that there exists $ c \in \Bbb C$ such that $f \equiv c$.
From Parseval's identity, we know that $\int_{0}^{2\pi} |f(x) - f \circ T(x)|^2 = \sum_{k \in Z} |\widehat {f - f \circ T} (k) |^2 \\.$
Therefore we can infer that $\widehat {f - f \circ T} (k)=0 \Rightarrow (by \ linearity) \ \hat f(k) = \widehat{ f \circ T} (k) \ \forall k \in \Bbb Z$
After doing some calculation we can also infer that for any "even" $k \in \Bbb Z$ , $ \widehat {f \circ T}(k) = \hat f (\frac{k}{2}) $.
so by induction we can infer now that for any $p \neq 0$, $ \widehat {f \circ T}(2^n\cdot p) = \hat f (p) $ From Riemann–Lebesgue lemma, we can now infer that $$ \lim_{n \to \infty}\widehat {f \circ T}(2^n\cdot p) = 0 \Rightarrow \hat f(p) = 0 , \ \forall p \neq 0$$
So now we conclude that Fouriee series of $f$ is $\hat f(0)$ and therefore $ f \equiv \hat f(0)$, so f is constant, as required.