Proving monotonicity of continuous linear functional

65 Views Asked by At

Hi I am interested in resolving the following problem from the bottom of page 147 from a paper I am revising:

Given a function $$a: \Omega \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{N}, a(x,u,\xi) = \{a_{i}(x,u,\xi)\}~~i=1,...,N$$

is a Caratheodory vector-valued function, that is, measurable with respect to $x$ in $\Omega$ for every $(s,\xi)$ in $\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^{N}$ and continuous with respect to $(s,\xi)$ in $\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^{N}$ for almost every $x$ in $\Omega$. It is also given that $a$ is monotone: $$\sum^{N}_{i=1}[a_{i}(x,s,\xi)-a_{i}(x,s,\xi^{*})](\xi_{i}-\xi_{i}^{*}) > 0$$ for a.e. $x$ in $\Omega$, for every $\xi,\xi^{*} \in \mathbb{R}^{N}$, $\xi \neq \xi^{*}$.

Consider another Caratheodory function $g: \Omega \times \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, such that $g \in L^{1}(\Omega)$ and it satisfies $$g(x,y)y \geq 0$$ for a.e. $x \in \Omega$ and for all $y \in \mathbb{R}$.

If we define continuous linear functionals $Au$ and $Gu$ as: $$\langle Au, v \rangle := \int_{\Omega}a(x,u,\nabla u)\cdot \nabla v dx$$ and $$\langle Gu,v \rangle := \int_{\Omega}g(x,u)vdx$$

for $u,v \in C^{\infty}_{c}(\Omega)$. How would you show that $A + G$ is monotone, which means, $$\langle (A + G)(u_{1})-(A+G)(u_{2}),u_{1}-u_{2}\rangle \geq 0~~~\forall u_{1},u_{2} \in C^{\infty}_{c}(\Omega)$$

Let me know if something is unclear. Thanks for any assistance.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

The authors may be using some notion of monotonicity different from what you expect (they never defined it). The inequality $$\langle (A + G)(u_{1})-(A+G)(u_{2}),u_{1}-u_{2}\rangle \geq 0\quad \forall u_{1},u_{2} \in C^{\infty}_{c}(\Omega) \tag{1}$$ does not follow from their assumptions. Indeed, since both $A$ and $G$ could be scaled independently from one another (the constants in their structural assumptions are not related), we can only expect (1) to hold if it holds for $A$ and $G$ separately. But it fails for $G$: the inequality $$ \int_\Omega \left[g(x,u_1(x))- g(x,u_2(x))\right]\left[u_1(x)-u_2(x)\right]\ge 0 \tag{2}$$ need not hold. For example, let $$ g(x,u) = \frac{u}{1+u^2} $$ then the inequality (2) becomes $$ \int_\Omega \frac{(u_1-u_2)^2 (1-u_1u_2)}{(1+u_1^2)(1+u_2^2)}\ge 0 \tag{3}$$ Clearly, (3) is false when we have, say, $u_1=2$ and $u_2=3$ on most of the domain.

Inequality (2) would be true if $g$ was assumed to be increasing with respect to $u$.