I'm trying to prove it by using invariant subspaces and this theorem, which is a final touch in my proof. I don't understand the theorem though. Why is invariance needed? "$A:V \longrightarrow V$, A-normal operator, $U$ is a subspace of $V$ and is invariant under the operator $A, A^*$. Then $A$ on $U$ is normal."
2026-03-28 04:00:48.1774670448
Proving that normal operators can be diagonalized
103 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in LINEAR-TRANSFORMATIONS
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- A different way to define homomorphism.
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Find matrix representation based on two vector transformations
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Basis-free proof of the fact that traceless linear maps are sums of commutators
- Assuming that A is the matrix of a linear operator F in S find the matrix B of F in R
- For what $k$ is $g_k\circ f_k$ invertible?
Related Questions in ADJOINT-OPERATORS
- How to prove that inequality for every $f\in C^\infty_0(\Bbb{R})$.
- Necessary condition for Hermician lin operators
- Is it true that a functor from a locally small category with a left adjoint is representable?
- Showing that these inner product induced norms are equivalent
- Do unitarily equivalent operators have the same spectrum?
- Showing that $\inf_{\|x\|=1}\langle Tx,x\rangle$ and $\sup_{\|x\|=1}\langle Tx,x\rangle$ are eigenvalues of $T$ (in particular when they are $0$)
- Let $T:\mathbb C^3\to\mathbb C^3$.Then, adjoint $T^*$ of $T$
- Role of the interval for defining inner product and boundary conditions in Sturm Liouville problems.
- Checking the well-definedness of an adjoint operator
- Either a self-adjoint operator has $n$ eigenvector or not at all
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Proof that normal matrices are diagonalizable: By Schur's decomposition $A=UTU^H$ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schur_decomposition) where $T$ is a upper triangular matrix, $U$ is a unitary matrix. Now $AA^H = A^HA \implies UTT^HU^H = UT^HTU^H \implies TT^H=T^HT$. Note that $T$ is upper triangular and satisfies $TT^H = T^HT$, Hence $T$ is diagonal. So Normal operators are diagonalizable.
In your case they must be demonstrating more information on normal matrices. Please write your question in more detail. Probably if you prove that in a subspace $U$ the matrix $A$ is normal then you can apply induction on dimension on the space and then conclude the proof by saying that $A$ is diagonalizable when restricted to $U$ as $\dim(U) < \dim(V)$ and induction can be applied for $A$ when restricted to $U$. Thats probably the point of your invariance theorem.