I need help with proving or disproving that the following surface $x^2+y^2+z^2=a^2,a>0$ is elementary. If I had another condition $z>0$ then the surface would be elementary because $rank g'=2$ where $g(x,y)=(x,y,\sqrt{a^2-x^2-y^2})$. But here I know that solution is that this set is not elementary, but not sure how to prove that using this definition with rank. Every help is appreciated.
2026-04-08 16:13:11.1775664791
Proving that surface is not elementary
38 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SURFACES
- Surface by revolution
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- 2D closed surface such that there's always a straight line to a point?
- parametrized surface are isometric if all corresponding curves have same length
- Klein bottle and torus in mod $p$ homology
- How can I prove that the restricted parametrization of a surface in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ ia a diffeomorphism?
- A diffeomorphism between a cylinder and a one-sheeted hyperboloid
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here's the beginning of an approach:
Suppose we had such a homeomorphism $g : U \to \mathbb R^3$. Then, the component functions would satisfy $$x(u, v)^2 + y(u, v)^2 + z(u, v)^2 = a^2,\text{ for all } u, v \in U.$$
The derivative $g'$ is of the form $$g'(u, v) = \begin{pmatrix}x_u(u, v) & x_v(u, v) \\ y_u(u, v) & y_v(u, v) \\ z_u(u, v) & z_v(u, v) \end{pmatrix}, $$ and we'd like to show that for all points $(u, v)$ this matrix cannot have rank 2. Note that differentiating the first equation with respect to $u$ and $v$ leads to two equations: $$2 x x_u + 2y y_u + 2z z_u = 0,$$ $$2 x x_v + 2y y_v + 2z z_v = 0.$$
I claim that these two equations lead to the rank of $g'$ being smaller than 2. Perhaps you can show that there is at least one point $(u, v)$ where one of the 2 by 2 minors $$x_u y_v - x_v y_u,\ x_u z_v - x_v z_u,\ y_u z_v - y_v z_u$$ vanishes.