Proving that the matrix representation of a nilpotent linear operator is upper-triangular with diagonal entries $ = 0$

359 Views Asked by At

Let T be a nilpotent operator on an $n$-dimensional vector space $V$, and suppose that $p$ is the smallest positive integer for which $T^P=T_0$ (zero-transformation).

I have so far proved the following subquestions:

  • $N(T^i) \subseteq N(T^{i+1})$ for every positive integer $i$

  • There is a sequence of ordered bases $\beta_1, \beta_2, ..., \beta_p$ such that $\beta_i$ is a basis for $N(T^i)$ and $\beta_{i+1}$ contains $\beta_i$ for $1 \leq i \leq p-1$

Now, I must show that if $\beta = \beta_p$ is the ordered basis for $N(T^p) = V$ constructed so that it contains all the previous $\beta_i$, then $[T]_\beta$ is upper-triagular with diagonal entries being zero

I'm having a hard time showing this, and even seeing why this is true.

The two statements I was asked to prove above implies that I can have a scenario where $T^1$ has an empty nullspace. This doesn't violate $N(T) \subseteq N(T^2)$ nor $\{\emptyset\} = \beta_1 \subseteq \beta_2$.

But in that case, the first element of $\beta$ (denoted $v_1$) is not in the kernel of $T$. So $T(v_1) \neq 0$, and this contradicts what I am supposed to prove.

Could someone help me understand where my logic is breaking down, and how one could show the above?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

4
On BEST ANSWER

Your logic is breaks down when you try to show $T$ is nilpotent. If $T$ has trivial nullspace (we can never have an empty nullspace), then $T$ has full rank and is invertible. Invertible matrices can never be nilpotent; we can just multiply $T^n = 0$ both sides by $T^{-1}$ $n$ times to get $I = 0$, a contradiction.

To prove this result, note that $T$ maps $N(T^{i+1})$ into $N(T^i)$. So, if $v \in \beta_{i+1}$, then $Tv \in \operatorname{span}(\beta_i)$. So, when you form your basis $\beta$, the image of each basis vector lies in the span of the basis vectors before it in the basis (not including itself). That is, if $\beta = (v_1, \ldots, v_n)$, then $$T(v_i) = a_{1i} v_1 + a_{2i} v_2 + \ldots + a_{(i-1)i}v_{i-1} + \color{red}0v_i + 0v_{i+1} + \ldots + 0v_n.$$ When forming the matrix for $T$ with respect to basis $\beta$, this turns into a column vector, placed in the matrix so that the red $0$ lies on the diagonal. This makes the matrix upper triangular, with a $0$ diagonal.