I need to prove those
- If $f(x)\ge 0$ and $\lim_{x\to x_0}f(x)=L$, then $\lim_{x\to x_0}\sqrt{f(x)}=\sqrt{L}$.
- If $\lim_{x\to x_0}f(x)=L$, then $\lim_{x\to x_0}|f(x)|=|L|$.
- If $f(x)\ge g(x)$ for every $x$ in the neighborhood of $x_0$ (maybe not in $x_0$ itself) and if $\lim_{x\to x_0}f(x)=L_1, \,\lim_{x\to x_0}g(x)=L_2$, then $L_1\ge L_2$.
but I am really confused because I think I have a counter example for the first two :
- For the first: $$f(x) =\begin{cases}0, & \text{if } x < 0 \\ 1, & \text{if } 0 \le x < 4\\ x^3, & \text{if } 4 \le x\end{cases}$$ In that way, if $x \to 4$, then the limit of $f(x)$ is $64$, but the limit of $\sqrt{4} = 2$ is $1$, and not $\sqrt{64} = 8$.
- Similar thing to the second one. $$f(x) =\begin{cases}1, & \text{if } x \le 0 \\ x^2, & \text{if }0<x \end{cases}$$ In that way if $x \to -2$, then the limit of $f(x) = 1$, but the limit of $|f(x)| = 4$ and not $|1| = 1$. I am probably missing something here, yet I don't know what is it.
- As for the third one, I can see how it is true yet I am not sure how I can prove it.
All three statements are correct; the following arguments comprise a "detailed" hint:
i) If $L = 0$, then (formally) we have $|\sqrt{f(x)} - L| = \sqrt{f(x)} < \varepsilon$ iff $f(x) < \varepsilon^{2}$; suppose $L \neq 0$. Then for all suitable $x$ we have $$ |\sqrt{f(x)} - \sqrt{L}| = \frac{|f(x) - L|}{\sqrt{f(x)} + \sqrt{L}}, $$ implying by assumption that there is some $\delta_{1} > 0$ such that $0 < |x-x_{0}| < \delta_{1}$ implies $|f(x) - L| < L/2$, implying $|f(x)| > L/2$, implying $\sqrt{f(x)} > \sqrt{L/2}$, implying $$ \frac{|f(x) - L|}{\sqrt{f(x)} + \sqrt{L}} < \frac{|f(x) - L|}{\sqrt{L/2} + \sqrt{L}}; $$ for every $\varepsilon > 0$, by assumption there is some $\delta_{2} > 0$ such that $0 < |x-x_{0}| < \delta_{2}$ implies $$ |f(x) - L| < \varepsilon \bigg( \sqrt{\frac{L}{2}} + \sqrt{L}\bigg). $$
ii) Note that (formally) we have $||f(x)| - |L|| \leq |f(x) - L|$.
iii) If $L_{1} < L_{2}$, then there is some $\delta_{1} > 0$ such that $0 < |x-x_{0}| < \delta_{1}$ implies $$ |g(x) - L_{2}| < \frac{L_{2}-L_{1}}{3} $$ and there is some $\delta_{2} > 0$ such that $0 < |x-x_{0}| < \delta_{2}$ implies $$ |f(x) - L_{1}| < \frac{L_{2}-L_{1}}{3}; $$ hence $0 < |x - x_{0}| < \min \{\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}\}$ implies $g(x) > f(x)$, a contradiction.