Detection of linear relationship is possible with correlation coefficient. If absolute value of correlation coefficient is 1, then the relationship is linear. Is there any way for detecting quadratic relationship? is there any way for detecting relationship between more than 2 variables?
2026-04-01 15:48:12.1775058492
quadratic relationship
6.5k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CORRELATION
- What is the name of concepts that are used to compare two values?
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- How to statistically estimate multiple linear coefficients?
- How do I calculate if 2 stocks are negatively correlated?
- A simple question on average correlation
- Two random variables generated with common random varibales
- Correlation of all zero rows and columns in matrix
- Calculating correlation matrix from covariance matrix - r>1
- Joint probability of (X+Z) $\land$ (Y+Z) for arbitrary distribution of X, Y, Z.
- Phase space: Uncorrelated Gaussian Summed With a Linearly Correlated Gaussian
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First fit the line $y=ax+b$ by least squares; then look for a correlation between $(x-\bar x)^2$ and the residuals, where $\bar x$ is the average of the $x$-values.
And remember, how big a correlation is statistically significant depends on the sample size, so use a t-test or an F-test for that.
And remember that fitting a polynomial by least squares is an instance of linear regression: Why is polynomial regression considered a kind of linear regression?
Later addendum in response to a comment:
First fit a hyperplane $y = a_1 x_1 + \cdots + a_k x_k$ by least squares. Then do an anova with the residuals from that fit as the response variable, and as predictors the variables $x_i - \bar x_i$, where $\bar x_i$ is the average of the values of $\bar x_i$ in all cases. Do an F-test with the sum of square sdue to all of the predictors in that anova as the numerator sum of squares, and the sum of square of the residuals from the anova as the denominator sum of squares.