It is common to write constraints with something like $x_s \leq y \quad \forall s \in X$ In Integer Programming, where x_s and y is a variable. However my tutor said that this not so absolutly correct since the quantifier is coming from logic and doesn't make sense in this form. He suggested to write for all as word instead. Is this correct?
2026-03-30 03:52:32.1774842752
Quantifier in Integer Programming/Logic
76 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in INTEGER-PROGRAMMING
- Dynamic programming for Knapsack problem
- Find minimum $x+y+z$ given $3x=4y=7z$ and $x, y, z \in \mathbb N^+$
- conditional constraints -Integer programming
- Integer programming proof: If an LP is unbounded then the IP is unbounded
- Integrality gap of maximum weighted clique
- "No two values are the same" constraint in linear programming
- Looking for some information on applications of integer linear programming
- How to find the number of possible ways to climb the staircase
- Consecutive binary variables, without using auxiliary variables
- Job Shop Optimization -- Minimize Total Completion Time
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is arguably a matter of style.
My -- quite strong -- personal opinion agrees with your tutor, though. The $\forall$ symbol is not a works-everywhere drop-in replacement for the words "for all". It's a sign that specifically belongs to formal, symbolic logic, so if you use it at all, you should follow the grammar of logical formulas. That means that "$\forall s$" must go in front of the property that you state holds for every value of $s$ -- not afterwards, and not with any weird spacing.
If, in your thinking, "for all $s$" comes after the property that holds for all $s$, then you're thinking with English grammar, and you should then notate your thoughts with English words and spelling too.